I concur with all of the above. And here's exactly where my issue comes in, the action.
When home I have my Benelli Super 90 by the door. 8 rounds, super light, semi auto, 12 ga. I have shot/handled it since '91 and it is still my go to when I shoot 3-Gun. At the house it stays clean and doesn't need any maintenance other than routine stuff. Now, when I put the sleeping bag in the backpack and head out, in my hands is an 870. Heavier and slower than the super 90 but after beating alders all day in the rain I know it will shoot just as reliably as it did that morning. Environment impacts my decision even though I'm probably 20-30% faster and probably slightly more accurate with the Benelli.
I think (that means my opinion which is for your consideration not to tell anyone they are all jacked up) too many people focus on what they shoot the best over how that firearm will act in the woods in bad conditions (two of three guys I know that shot bears in self defense shot at least one round from the ground do to various reasons). I'd rather have the reliability of knowing I'll get six rounds out if I have time than hoping for all 20 to work because I landed face down in 3' of muskeg from tripping over my own feet trying to face the freight train headed for me. And if you have enough time to shoot a bear 20 times, did you really need to shoot it or did you just get scared?
I think I already said this in this thread but I had lots of friends that carried .357 and we had the same arguments back then about capabilities/speed/accuracy back then. I'm probably getting close to needing to reconsider something easier on the wrists...or investing in brakes
But I'm pretty hard headed so I'll probably keep the .44 in the bag of tricks.