Bullet Construction vs Lethality

It would be nice to see how some of your bullets expand in big game animals, particularly elk. Didn't see any pics on your website. I would also appreciate any advice you could give on hunting elk in the southern black hills, seeing that you are just south of me in SD.

Black HIlls Elk Hunt Advice Needed
I know at least 2 members who have plenty of real-world experience that can answer you directly but are shying away from the s**t show, but check this out >>> https://www.longrangehunting.com/th...thread-from-bc-to-terminal-ballistics.245696/
 
Last edited:
Dumb guy here and after pages 1-14 (with mild derailments) I appreciate the education. Stupid question but here goes. How is it that we are still mainly using lead and copper for projectiles? Where is the research on other alloys? If a titanium receiver is stronger then wouldn't it stand to reason there are stronger alloys than lead and copper? I know someone mentioned depleted uranium from a tank or anti aircraft gun, but seriously, 300 plus years of shoulder fired projectiles and we are still at lead, copper or lead and copper?

(Is this where I say asking for a friend?)
We're still using copper/lead bullets because they work for most of us. I have a model 70 30-06 I bought back in the late 70's when I was in high school. It shoots Federal 150 grain soft points well. My longest shot on a deer was 200ish yards on a 180lb field dressed buck. I shot him in the shoulder and the bullet came out at the base of his neck on the offside. He went straight down and didn't move. I've killed a semi load of deer with that bullet, never an issue. I now hunt with a 260 and load Sierra 120gr Pro Hunters, so far it's performed well for me.

I only load for 260 and 22-250, cup and core bullets work fine for .17-to $.25 each, I'll stop shooting before I pay $1 or more per bullet.


A bullet is just a tool, choose the right bullet for the job and you'll have no problems. There are always exceptions or conditions you can't plan for.
 
It is funny the Barnes boys added that blue coating in the 90's, we we're opening cans of 20mm Vulcan rounds in the 70's with same blue coating, nothN new.Tungsten bullets, the Speer boys had e'm 375 caliber, about 20 some years ago, 25 for $75 bucks.
 
Yup a lot of the principals behind bullet lethality have been the same for decades. Like for example the transfer on energy by losing the front section of a bullet and the rear core continuing on for a pass through. What bullet does that sound like? Or the search for the perfect mushrooming bullet? Both concepts have been around for a long time.
 
We're still using copper/lead bullets because they work for most of us. I have a model 70 30-06 I bought back in the late 70's when I was in high school. It shoots Federal 150 grain soft points well. My longest shot on a deer was 200ish yards on a 180lb field dressed buck. I shot him in the shoulder and the bullet came out at the base of his neck on the offside. He went straight down and didn't move. I've killed a semi load of deer with that bullet, never an issue. I now hunt with a 260 and load Sierra 120gr Pro Hunters, so far it's performed well for me.

I only load for 260 and 22-250, cup and core bullets work fine for .17-to $.25 each, I'll stop shooting before I pay $1 or more per bullet.


A bullet is just a tool, choose the right bullet for the job and you'll have no problems. There are always exceptions or conditions you can't plan for.
100% agree for the overwhelming majority of hunters and shooters. I hunt in mid Missouri so 1000yd canyon shots are non existent. But devil's advocate in me says lead shot, copper shot, blends, bismuth all worked just fine, yet we still have TSS on the shelves now.
Plasma flatscreens came out at astronomical prices $5000-$10000, now a 70" TV sells at Walmart for under $1500. Maybe a hyperbole but for me, something like tungsten or a new alloy would be a far better to advance bullet construction than continuing to try and stretch the current methods. But I've been accused of being a dreamer before. 6000FPS without disintegration would be a flat shooter…
 
100% agree for the overwhelming majority of hunters and shooters. I hunt in mid Missouri so 1000yd canyon shots are non existent. But devil's advocate in me says lead shot, copper shot, blends, bismuth all worked just fine, yet we still have TSS on the shelves now.
Plasma flatscreens came out at astronomical prices $5000-$10000, now a 70" TV sells at Walmart for under $1500. Maybe a hyperbole but for me, something like tungsten or a new alloy would be a far better to advance bullet construction than continuing to try and stretch the current methods. But I've been accused of being a dreamer before. 6000FPS without disintegration would be a flat shooter…

Barnes had the MRX line that had tungsten in the base of the bullet. It looks like this (not my picture):

IMG_8604.jpeg


Here's a post from Bryan Litz talking about the subject as well:

IMG_8603.jpeg


And here's a link to an article talking about tungsten in bullets:

 
Last edited:
Barnes has the MRX line that has tungsten in the base of the bullet. It looks like this (not my picture):

View attachment 490513

Here's a post from Bryan Litz talking about the subject as well:

View attachment 490514

And here's a link to an article talking about tungsten in bullets:

Yep those Tungsten bullets would be more applicable to a Wyoming State Trooper, tryN to stop a Buick Wildcat motor.
 
Barnes has the MRX line that has tungsten in the base of the bullet. It looks like this (not my picture):

View attachment 490513

Here's a post from Bryan Litz talking about the subject as well:

View attachment 490514

And here's a link to an article talking about tungsten in bullets:

Barnes no longer makes the MRX line of bullets, they stopped making them I believe due to poor performance or poor sales.
 
Barnes no longer makes the MRX line of bullets, they stopped making them I believe due to poor performance or poor sales.
Right. And that's what I was referring to in an early post saying they were abandoned. I just wanted to show the bullet. I edited the post you replied to to say "had" now instead of "has", to maybe be clearer lol
 
Here's the Granddaddy of all bullet failures I've heard of to date. A 300gr .338 OTM Burger failed to penetrate the shoulder of a doe antelope. I would doubt the story... except I talked with Ray enough to respect his hunting experiences. He had hunted alot. Africa. Alaska. I haven't heard from Ray for years now. Hope he's OK and still hunting. It doesn't look like he's posted on this Forum since 2018. Last contact I had with him, Ray led me to believe his preferred hunting bullet for his 338 Lapua Improved rifles was the 300gr Sierra Match King.

Bullets sometimes misbehave, like teenagers. Here's a copy and paste from Ray's 2015 Post:

"Well, I have never shared this publicly before tonight. I'm the guy that shot a doe Antelope and the bullet never entered the vitals that I could see. Before I explain I need to back up a little.

When Berger came out with the 300g Berger I bought 250 of them. Shortly after we heard about the slump nose problem, so I did not shoot them. They are still in my cabinet as a matter of fact. A little while later they came out with the OTM's and I purchased 250. Don't remember what year that was?

In 2014 I used them exclusively that year. The Doe (antelope) was 800+yards out. Wind was full value 8-10mph. When I shot the doe went straight down. My 12 year-old grandson and I drove my utv up to what we thought was dead animal. When I pulled up next to it she picked up her head. When I got out to finish it, she tried to get up and run but could not. She actually made it 1/2 way into my Ranger then fell out. I could not believe what I was seeing and all this in front of my grandson!

When I gutted it, I was looking for damage to the vitals and could not find any damage at all! The bullet hit her square in the shoulder. Yea, yea I know! I was aiming for crease but was off about 3" hitting shoulder squarely. When we skinned it, looked like bomb went off on entrance side. It was blood shot badly all the way up to head. Don't think we saved any meat from that front quarter. Opposite side was perfectly fine?


If you wanna read Ray's entire Post, here's a link to the Thread. See Post #195.

WOW, I can not get my head around how a .338/300gr bullet splats on an antelope shoulder at what was probably modest velocity. The guy is sharing his experience and no argument there. Just when you shoot several deer close in with a full speed 165 grain cup and core out of a 30-06 and it blows through both shoulder can't conceive of .338/300gr splatting on such a light animal at way lower velocity, major misbehavior. Using cup and core lead bullet out of 06, 270 and 7-08 from 50y to 350y with nary a blowup nor failure to down animals couple dozen times makes me feel super lucky and wonder why others have such bad experiences.
 
WOW, I can not get my head around how a .338/300gr bullet splats on an antelope shoulder at what was probably modest velocity. The guy is sharing his experience and no argument there. Just when you shoot several deer close in with a full speed 165 grain cup and core out of a 30-06 and it blows through both shoulder can't conceive of .338/300gr splatting on such a light animal at way lower velocity, major misbehavior. Using cup and core lead bullet out of 06, 270 and 7-08 from 50y to 350y with nary a blowup nor failure to down animals couple dozen times makes me feel super lucky and wonder why others have such bad experiences.
People like to conentrate on the negative. Here's the rest of his findings.

"Late 2014, early 2015 I purchased 750 more 300g OTM's. To my surprise, the meplats and holes looked great! Literally had a handful of bullets with blocked tips.
2015 hunting season has been great. 3 Antelope, 6x5 Bull Elk andso far 4 Whitetail. All one shot kills and all were dead before they hit the ground.
Okay, long winded I know but I truly believe Berger makes the best long range 300g bullet out there. I also think that the 300g SMK is a very close second. The only bullets in my reloading room are Bergers and Sierra's.
Seems to me if the holes are unobstructed the bullets should perform as advertised. I did not figure this out, people on this forum and others did. So thank you!

Ray"
 
Being the pessimist that I am I doubt that anyone can hit a golf ball at 1000 yards with each shot no matter how good they are. I see the golf ball on the web site, but don't see where it says that they teach you to be able to do that. I did a fair amount of 1000 yard shooting in the Army and while we were not shooting the new precision rifles (Winchester Model 70 Match Rifles in 300 H&H Mag) keeping the shots in the 10 ring of a 1000 yard target was difficult enough. I went through the long range shooting introduction out at Vortex last January. The intro course is shot on their indoor 100 yard range using Ruger Precision Rifles chambered for the 6.5 Creepmore. The final exercise was to shoot a 5 shot group at an ace of spades card at 100 yards to see how tight a group you could shoot. One of my students, Kathy had come along and was taking the course with me, and my final group, as measured by the Vortex instructors was .856 (see attached photo and yes there are 5 shots there) Of course my student did better than I did, shooting a .650. (My students often outshoot me and I have absolutely no problem with that) The point here is that even shooting with modern rifles in a touted very good target caliber nobody's shots were going to hit a golf ball at 1000 yards, even indoors, prone with a rest, no wind, no mirage and no pressure at 1000 yards. I would love to see any of the Barbour Creek instructors shoot 10 out of 10 golf balls a 1000 yards. The one that is shown on the web site is a selling point, can it be done, yes. Can it be done on a regular basis? I doubt it and if they can show me how to do that even 5 out of 10 shots I will sign up for their course.
Yo, "6.5 Creepmore"...a new one for me. Kinda likin it. 👍
 
People like to conentrate on the negative. Here's the rest of his findings.

"Late 2014, early 2015 I purchased 750 more 300g OTM's. To my surprise, the meplats and holes looked great! Literally had a handful of bullets with blocked tips.
2015 hunting season has been great. 3 Antelope, 6x5 Bull Elk andso far 4 Whitetail. All one shot kills and all were dead before they hit the ground.
Okay, long winded I know but I truly believe Berger makes the best long range 300g bullet out there. I also think that the 300g SMK is a very close second. The only bullets in my reloading room are Bergers and Sierra's.
Seems to me if the holes are unobstructed the bullets should perform as advertised. I did not figure this out, people on this forum and others did. So thank you!

Ray"
I like this post, but still trying to connect it to the failure he tells about. Wouldn't the said tip problem result in a pencil-through rather than a splat? Various factors could have gone into that scenario. Coulda been a juicy June beetle that got in the way along the journey. Hah 😉
 
So if vitals were fine, did it drop and bleed out from just the shoulder wound? 🤔

*Edit to add: Went and read the rest of his post. He found several bullets with clogged openings. I'll bet it penciled through and he didn't notice the minimal wounding to vitals and the likely small exit.

Impact velocity at 800+ yards for that bullet and cartridge would have been in the 1800-1900fps range, and not a lot of resistance from antelope.

That's what makes the most sense to me anyway.
Except all the bloodshot tissue on impact side... 🤔
 
Top