• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Your Ultimate 500 Yard Rig

Been looking into it, few guys that run 16's are getting 2650-2680 some 2700 with a suppressor with 140's. I know not super flat but....it's really what I'm getting out of my Gap-10 currently with Its 21" barrel

I could just pull my 300AX out if I want a laser. 5.2 moa to 500 with a 100 yard zero
I was just being funny sir. As the chief officer of the "Creedmoor effing sucks" committee, it's my place.
 
I was gonna say I already have mine. It's a very light weight all ti and carbon from pierce. And yes it's a creed. For 500 yards why not those hammer hunters have shown me nothing that wouldn't give me confidence at that range. I would like to build the same gun but long action in a .338 laps improved one day. Just because I have a barrel to fire form with.
I know the creed is not what most like and some twats really think it's better than a win mag. That being said if you think a .308 or 7mm 08 is ok the then so should the creed.
 
I was gonna say I already have mine. It's a very light weight all ti and carbon from pierce. And yes it's a creed. For 500 yards why not those hammer hunters have shown me nothing that wouldn't give me confidence at that range. I would like to build the same gun but long action in a .338 laps improved one day. Just because I have a barrel to fire form with.
I know the creed is not what most like and some twats really think it's better than a win mag. That being said if you think a .308 or 7mm 08 is ok the then so should the creed.
May I ask what is lacking about the Lapua, for it to need "improved" ? They've killed insurgents at over a mile. I would think it was good enough. But I also understand the want for mo-powa. That's why I use a .300 Win Mag and not a .308. Not attacking your choices, just curious.
 
I shoot a Rem. Kevlar stocked Mountain rifle in .280 Rem. with a VX-3 3.5 X 10 w/AO...……..ALL loaded weighs in at about 8#....Have been hunting with it since 1989, and hunt the toughest terrain in the San Bernardino Mountains in Southern California in a public land environment. This is by far my Dream Rifle out to 500 yds.
 
May I ask what is lacking about the Lapua, for it to need "improved" ? They've killed insurgents at over a mile. I would think it was good enough. But I also understand the want for mo-powa. That's why I use a .300 Win Mag and not a .308. Not attacking your choices, just curious.

Yep just for more umpf.
I have a .375 Allen mag so my brother made a lapua improved to try and keep up. So I did my 110ba stealth with the same reamer so I could do all the forming. So since we have a lot of formed brass and parts I figured why not a lightweight improved.
Plus the faster you drive it the less drop and wind drift so that helps.
 
Since I'm used to shooting to 1.000 yards in competition a 500 yard shot with a 6.5 PRC cartridge is not a long shot on a deer sized animal, conditions being optimum.

My new Browning 6.5 PRC X-Bolt Pro "semi-custom" rifle arrives next week. Then I sell that exact same X-Bolt Pro rifle in 6.5 CM that I have had for only 2 years B/C I wanted more ft. lb. of energy for longer ranges here in Nevada. At the time I bought the 6.5 CM X- bolt the 6.5 PRC was not available in an X-Bolt.

"Your Ultimate 500 Yard Scope" is the next question.
My answer is a Bushnell Elite 4.5 - 18 x 44 scope. FFP, 30 mm tube, illuminated G3 mil reticle (to use with my LRF binocular rangefinder/ballistic calculator).
This scope is relatively light at 27 oz. and has very good glass. At that weight it is a good match for my 6 lb. 3 oz. X-bolt Pro rifle.

Eric B.
 
Single Shot Merkel K3 in 7mm-08 shooting Hornady ELDX 150 grain at 2770 fps.
backup
Single shot Blaser K95 in 7mm-08 shooting Hornady ELDX 150 grain at 2720 fps.

The merkel likes this load to 500 and gives me 2" 3 shot groups every time.
The blaser not as good, 2.5" groups ...
Not complaining nor comparing. love both the same, but just have shot more animals with my Merkel...
SnT
 
I used to have a .264 had it bored out to take .300 Weatherby cases way back when I was a kid in high school and had to save every cent to buy powder, bullets and primers.
I have now acquired another 264 win mag. I'm hoping to shoot it this weekend. It was originally a 257 bee on a mark v action. Now it's a 28" 1-8 Brux barrelled 264 win with Leica 4x20x50 glass.
 
Weatherby Mark 5 Super Big Game Master in 300Wby. Leupold LPS 3.5-14x50 in dual dovetail rings and bases. Norma case, fed 215MM primer lighting a healthy dose of RL22 to push a Swift 165 grain Scirocco. This actually was used to harvest my only Booner at 418 yards. I wouldn't and haven't changed a thing. When I have a non resident tag with horns involved, this is the primary rifle. My back-up, bad weather/boat-paddle gun is a Rem 700 in .260. Built with a second hand HS-Precision sporter stock, Lilja barrel with an 8 twist finished at 24". Regular X-Mark pro trigger that pulls at 40 Oz. with a Leupold VX-III 3.5-10x40. Depending on the year this will be loaded with 125gr Partitions, 130gr Accubonds, 130gr Sciroccos, or 130gr HPBT Gamekings. Unless it was big bears we were after, I would be using this as the back-up. I like other 6.5s (6.5-06 is my favorite). I LOVE the .257Wby and .270Wby and I am a huge fan of the .338RUM. When it come to a serious hunt with lots of work and limited opportunity to shoot the 300 and the 260 get the nod.
 
I hope it's this: Cooper M92 backcountry in 300 Win Mag, Zeiss V6 3-15, it'll get its first go this fall!
 

Attachments

  • 4F251272-8D4F-4056-8887-8DEABC928B15.jpeg
    4F251272-8D4F-4056-8887-8DEABC928B15.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 138
Been mulling this over. I think this rifle in a 6.5 PRC, which I have, would be my top choice if someone said I could only bring 1 rifle and we don't know if we are backpacking, horse packing, or riding bikes. 8.5lbs ready to shoot. Normally I shoot a chassis, but this rifle has been nice to shoot
 

Attachments

  • A4CFE8F5-735B-4ABF-8FAA-99C32C314E40.jpeg
    A4CFE8F5-735B-4ABF-8FAA-99C32C314E40.jpeg
    488.9 KB · Views: 141
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top