royinidaho
Well-Known Member
I disagree, I will take every yard I can gain before going to holding at the bottom of the reticle or on an alternate target up the mountain, when we start shooting and holding of the consistency is much harder, the more rail or higher we crank an adjustable rail the hard it gets to maintain consistency behind the optic, start shaving of serious amounts of MOA starts helping IMO.
I'm gonna give this thought a go.
I have a 40 MOA cant on the rail and the Leupold TS-29 retical and intend to use the reticle to its full extent. I had the MK-4 converted from to that reticle before the TS-32 was available.
Note that all of this is for extending the range at a fixed target. Not a hunting situation.
In a hunting situation I agree with you totally.
Have some heavy 375s projectiles with a published obscene high bc to give a go.
So far the Hammer 395 version two, as I call them, are doing the trick to 1125.
Initial testing show a darn close published G7 and around .25 MOA consistency at 1125 and pure devastation type terminal performance.
I'm gonna kill me a rock at a fur-piece away.
And to think my "big girl" is only 5 years old and now is a lil' kid on the block.