greatwhitehntr
Well-Known Member
You are correct it was dirty and hi ES with 215 Bergers in 300RUMI bet it wouldn't have been so dirty if I was shooting 230gr .
230 Bergers at 93.5 grains cleaned it up and my ES went to 10 over 12 rounds
You are correct it was dirty and hi ES with 215 Bergers in 300RUMI bet it wouldn't have been so dirty if I was shooting 230gr .
Shoots well for me. I like it.
Labradar was used for these numbers. That group was 2960 with ES of 12. A prevIous group was 2957 and ES of 18. It's been fairly consistent and hangs around the 15-20 ES with other bullet, brass, and primer combos. I've been happy with it.What kind of velocity are you seeing? Got a jug of it to try out.
Labradar was used for these numbers. That group was 2960 with ES of 12. A prevIous group was 2957 and ES of 18. It's been fairly consistent and hangs around the 15-20 ES with other bullet, brass, and primer combos. I've been happy with it.
It's a Christensen Arms Ridgeline. Overall cartridge length is about 3.65". I started with 8133 bc I couldn't find any of the powders you mention. I think I'll stick with it for now.Wow that's awesome. I'm getting 2875 es 12 sd of 4 in Norma brass right now with h1000 and 26 inch barrel. My gun didn't like retumbo so I gave up on it maybe I gave up to quick lol. Figured I would buy a jug of 8133 because 565 and 570 is like finding a unicorn. Is your rifle a custom build?
I like the brass. It is heavier than the w-w brass I was using before. I definitely dropped my powder charge in order to use it . That is clearly explained on their website. I'm out of town right now or I would give you numbers. Primers are good so far but will see as I continue to shoot.Oh I must of missed it first go around sorry about that. Ya nothing wrong with that load at all. I just seen adg brass on the net the first time a few days ago. How do you like it. Does it weigh more or less as other brass? How does it compare to case capacity? I got to get away from Norma to soft for my liking. After a couple reloads primers feel little loose.
I would have thought the 8133 would have produced more velocity than the H1000That's interesting that IMR 8133 is so much slower than H1000 but it showed more pressure at the same speeds?