Politically, the wildfire situation is pretty screwed up. Most environmental organizations that sue a government agency over them wanting to log or prescribe burn an area is because the FS or BLM just wants to burn the area so that they can harvest timber, even if the area ecologically should not be touched. These two agencies manage the forests for the most part as a tree farm... Not in a manner that is ecologically sound and not for the actual health of the forest.
Just letting the fires burn (at this point) would cause further issues by allowing certain plant species to take hold that promote more frequentll and hotter fires. It's an incredibly complicated problem to solve and rehab.
Even if we did manage fires and prescribe burns perfectly well to get forests back to a state of being able to burn themselves out without massive destruction, we may not be able to get to that state due to the beetle kill issues. More acidic rain (than pre fossil fuel days) decreases forest health and is one of the primary reasons beetles are able to take hold of various forests where they didn't in the past. Constant die off from beetles compounds the issue.
Just letting the fires burn (at this point) would cause further issues by allowing certain plant species to take hold that promote more frequentll and hotter fires. It's an incredibly complicated problem to solve and rehab.
Even if we did manage fires and prescribe burns perfectly well to get forests back to a state of being able to burn themselves out without massive destruction, we may not be able to get to that state due to the beetle kill issues. More acidic rain (than pre fossil fuel days) decreases forest health and is one of the primary reasons beetles are able to take hold of various forests where they didn't in the past. Constant die off from beetles compounds the issue.