Snowrun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2012
- Messages
- 113
I havent posted to this forum much because i haven't felt i had much to contribute to the long range discussions, however, wolves brought me to this site due to the desire to know exactly where i can hit one of these cowards at long range first shot.
Not trying to brag, take my words for what you will but i have put in more back country miles off trail than most would dream of. Last weekend i put in a hike in 10'58" that I was told was not humanly possible in 12'50", my first time several years ago.
I have killed mature bulls most years and have hunted antlers from the bitterroot to the paradise valley and beyond. I have seen the impact of these predators.
All arguments aside regarding the correct species being reintroduced, these predators came from hunting caribou and moose in open range and were let loose on an elk population that has never had to deal with any predator this voracious nor this blood thirsty.
I have personally talked to the biologist for the Paradise Valley who told me years ago of a 10%/year reduction in the herd. Counts of 130 bulls on the Emigrant Peak range went to a handful, now next to nothing. I have seen multiple kills where very little is eaten & the pack move on to fresh killing grounds. Teaching young? wanton waste? i dont know but the end result is the same. Imagine having to watch your back 24/7 much less worry about your young whom you have so much invested in.
Those of you spewing the pro-wolf pre-packaged points regarding poaching, excessive hunting kills, bears, cougars etc. need to spend more time in the real woods & less time at the environmentalist propaganda tables set up in Yellowstone & elsewhere tailored for your mindset that is willing to accept any feel-good garbage that makes these killers seem to fit the ecosystem.
While a managed population of the correct species to fit the area may be acceptable, we were all lied to about "recovery populations" and my advice to any and all states that are considering an agreement of this type is to resist any effort at "reintroduction", they will lie to get their foot in the door & stab you in the back. These are not honorable people, we learned the hard way in MT.
See attached, I have personally witnessed the wanton waste these pack mentality cowards propagate. The bull in the photos was less than 1/4 mile from his winter range of the previous year, I have his shed horns. the blood trail in the snow was sickening. Imagine trying to keep your feet under you while a gang member takes cheap shots at your guts & groin. One on one, they wont risk it but like most cowards, will distract while another takes a cheap shot to promote blood loss & eventually weakness.
At least a cat will kill quickly and eat what it kills so that argument in my opinion is out the window. Bears, might not be popular but I think we need to remove the requirement to use the meat, especially in wilderness areas. I saw 5 bears in 2 days last year, cant tell me they don't impact calf numbers but there's no way I'm packing meat I don't personally enjoy 7+ miles. If it was a rug & skull yeah, greasy meat, no, just my opinion.
If I need to be excluded from this site for any of the above comments, let me know from someone with a serious number of posts & I'll not be seen here again. This is one subject that I am happy to say my peace & move on.
Shaun
Not trying to brag, take my words for what you will but i have put in more back country miles off trail than most would dream of. Last weekend i put in a hike in 10'58" that I was told was not humanly possible in 12'50", my first time several years ago.
I have killed mature bulls most years and have hunted antlers from the bitterroot to the paradise valley and beyond. I have seen the impact of these predators.
All arguments aside regarding the correct species being reintroduced, these predators came from hunting caribou and moose in open range and were let loose on an elk population that has never had to deal with any predator this voracious nor this blood thirsty.
I have personally talked to the biologist for the Paradise Valley who told me years ago of a 10%/year reduction in the herd. Counts of 130 bulls on the Emigrant Peak range went to a handful, now next to nothing. I have seen multiple kills where very little is eaten & the pack move on to fresh killing grounds. Teaching young? wanton waste? i dont know but the end result is the same. Imagine having to watch your back 24/7 much less worry about your young whom you have so much invested in.
Those of you spewing the pro-wolf pre-packaged points regarding poaching, excessive hunting kills, bears, cougars etc. need to spend more time in the real woods & less time at the environmentalist propaganda tables set up in Yellowstone & elsewhere tailored for your mindset that is willing to accept any feel-good garbage that makes these killers seem to fit the ecosystem.
While a managed population of the correct species to fit the area may be acceptable, we were all lied to about "recovery populations" and my advice to any and all states that are considering an agreement of this type is to resist any effort at "reintroduction", they will lie to get their foot in the door & stab you in the back. These are not honorable people, we learned the hard way in MT.
See attached, I have personally witnessed the wanton waste these pack mentality cowards propagate. The bull in the photos was less than 1/4 mile from his winter range of the previous year, I have his shed horns. the blood trail in the snow was sickening. Imagine trying to keep your feet under you while a gang member takes cheap shots at your guts & groin. One on one, they wont risk it but like most cowards, will distract while another takes a cheap shot to promote blood loss & eventually weakness.
At least a cat will kill quickly and eat what it kills so that argument in my opinion is out the window. Bears, might not be popular but I think we need to remove the requirement to use the meat, especially in wilderness areas. I saw 5 bears in 2 days last year, cant tell me they don't impact calf numbers but there's no way I'm packing meat I don't personally enjoy 7+ miles. If it was a rug & skull yeah, greasy meat, no, just my opinion.
If I need to be excluded from this site for any of the above comments, let me know from someone with a serious number of posts & I'll not be seen here again. This is one subject that I am happy to say my peace & move on.
Shaun