I have no intention of debating an issue with an individual who does not know the definition of 'Theory'.
Suffice it to say that your conjecture should be backed up by fact.
Fact... Since the advent of our species some 77% of the wildlife has dissappeared.
Fact... Ten percent of that has occured since 1980.
Before you begin to grasp at straws..Those figures do not suggest that we are responsible completely for the 77% but they do illustrate a glaring fact that we bear a great deal of responsibility and cannot afford to exterminate species, because in doing so ours is also on the conveyor belt..
I do not indulge in 'peeing' contests.
"Pax hominibus bonae voluntatis, hinc in vitam quid faciemus, in aeternam resonat."
Latin... "Peace to men of good will, for what we do in life echoes through eternity."
Have an Happy New Year...
I didn't provide conjecture- nor theory -to you in response to your fallacious post. What I submitted was cynical philosophy because you DO NOT know anymore than any other person(s) on this planet regarding how this planet's environment should be shaped. Please excuse me for pointing out that the doom of Easter Island cannot be confirmed, though. Heaven forbid somebody point out your conjecture.
I'm curious, that 77% you mention, do you know what fraction of the 95% I mentioned it represents? I'm sure it's infinitesimal.
Also, tell me how I should feel responsible for saving the planet, or a single species when this planet is historically subject to catastrophic disasters of inexperienced magnitude? I suppose we should build big lasers to zap asteroids and special spacecraft to drill into them for explosive deposition and subsequent fractionation. Please forgive me, though, for showing humility in knowing I, nor anyone else has the right answer- that does not mean we cannot find the best answer, however.
And spare us the latin lesson. Save it for Carl Pope and The Sierra Club, Mr. Green Peace. Arrogant, genocidal environmentalists eat that stuff up. They just love feeling more authoritative and distinguished like they actually know more.
(And if you have no intention of debating, then why respond in the first place?)