NeedForSpeed
Well-Known Member
Seekins precision in 300 wm 7 lb before scopeConsidered the x-bolts. But the weight is that Lr is why they're out.
Seekins precision in 300 wm 7 lb before scopeConsidered the x-bolts. But the weight is that Lr is why they're out.
300wsm is used in F class matches some but in that weight amount I would do a 300 win mag from proof or just have one built big horn action and proof pre fit barrel with a AG cat stock in carbon fiber, brake it with a hollland red brake still would be around 6 3/4 -7 lbs with out scopeI'm about to pull the trigger on a new rifle. I want it in a 300 for bigger animals such as elk although I will use it for deer here in Oklahoma at times.
Question is: 300WM or 300WSM
The reason I'm even considering the wsm is for the weight savings. I hope to have this come in at 8.5# or even less. That's hunting weight.
If I'm wanting to possibly shoot longer ranges, how much difference is there? Which should I go with?
Sorry, but I would have to disagree with the WSM not being a long range elk capable rifle. It's very capable and if you review reloading manuals it's even faster. Looking in my most recent version of Hornadys 10th edition and the Hodgdon online recent version it's about 50fps per second faster shooting almost every bullet. 200 grain ELDX out of WSM at 2950fps and 300WM at 2900 fps. The WSM is a more efficient load and cheaper to load for. Components are very affordable. I run my WSM with a 180 Swift Scirroco Ballistic tip at about 3100 FPS. Anyways I own both, both are very capable of taking any North American game animal.WSM is very efficient on shorter barrels. If barrel length/ a shorter package isn't much of a concern. Go Wm. I wouldn't consider a WSM much of a long range elk slayer.... but for LR deer WSM is my choice.
I LOVE my 300 Weatherby. But my friends 300 RUM is also VERY nice. Both are on Remington Sendero rigs so don't match your weight goal. I prefer the weight for stability.Weatherby
The 300 WSM will do almost what the 300 WM will do will bullets up to 180 grains. That seem adequate for elk size game out a ways. If I were looking at going to a LA cartridge, I'd bypass all and step into the 300 Norma Mag. I'd even make it a 40° Ackley. Only issue is you need a 338 Lapua bolt face. The 300 WSM is a great cartridge AND you will save some weight.I'm about to pull the trigger on a new rifle. I want it in a 300 for bigger animals such as elk although I will use it for deer here in Oklahoma at times.
Question is: 300WM or 300WSM
The reason I'm even considering the wsm is for the weight savings. I hope to have this come in at 8.5# or even less. That's hunting weight.
If I'm wanting to possibly shoot longer ranges, how much difference is there? Which should I go with?
I'd go with the new 7.6 CreedmoorI'm about to pull the trigger on a new rifle. I want it in a 300 for bigger animals such as elk although I will use it for deer here in Oklahoma at times.
Question is: 300WM or 300WSM
The reason I'm even considering the wsm is for the weight savings. I hope to have this come in at 8.5# or even less. That's hunting weight.
If I'm wanting to possibly shoot longer ranges, how much difference is there? Which should I go with?
I'm about to pull the trigger on a new rifle. I want it in a 300 for bigger animals such as elk although I will use it for deer here in Oklahoma at times.
Question is: 300WM or 300WSM
The reason I'm even considering the wsm is for the weight savings. I hope to have this come in at 8.5# or even less. That's hunting weight.
If I'm wanting to possibly shoot longer ranges, how much difference is there? Which should I go with?
I'm about to pull the trigger on a new rifle. I want it in a 300 for bigger animals such as elk although I will use it for deer here in Oklahoma at times.
Question is: 300WM or 300WSM
The reason I'm even considering the wsm is for the weight savings. I hope to have this come in at 8.5# or even less. That's hunting weight.
If I'm wanting to possibly shoot longer ranges, how much difference is there? Which should I go with?