The Weatherby has a nice, long neck. I am a hand-loader and I appreciate having more neck to seat the bullet into.Double radius shoulder, No thank you.
Belt, No thank you.
Really the only thing the 300 Weatherby has going for it is nostalgia. Nothing wrong with that.
38 lapua drops way too much. Almost twice as much, as the 338-378 Weatherby. I guess to each his own. When it comes to the sport of hunting/shooting.Better is a relative term. If we are sticking strictly to 30 cal. I personal prefer the standard 300 Win Mag over the weatherby just because I don't think you gain enough to justify the extra recoil. If I where going to step up I would step up to the 300 Norma Improved or the 338 RUM/Edge. Both are realistically, along with the 30/378 and 338/378 weatherby mags, of which I own a 30/378 Wby mag and a 338 RUM, the only true 1000 yard cartridges (IMHO). There are lesser cartridges that will do the job, like the 28 nosler, but with less energy than I believe is needed on game the size of elk and larger. A second is a long time for an animal to move and only those listed above can do 800 yards and beyond in less than or a little over a second. If I were going up I would go bigger than the 300 wby for this reason. If staying inside 750 yards the 300 win is all the gun you'll need. (JMHO) Considering hard rebarreling my 30/378 to either a 300 Norma Improved, a 338 Lapua AI (my smiths recommendation) or a 375/338 Lapua AI.
If you buy, or just shoot a Weatherby Accu-mark rifle, with a KDF on it. They [all calipers], will shoot just like a baby. With little recoil. trust me.The Weatherby has a nice, long neck. I am a hand-loader and I appreciate having more neck to seat the bullet into.
I also built a 30 338 on a spring field high # with a brake highly figured walnut kicks like a baby compaired to the WeatherbyIf you buy, or just shoot a Weatherby Accu-mark rifle, with a KDF on it. They [all calipers], will shoot just like a baby. With little recoil. trust me.
I doubt it, but if your happy with it. Great.I also built a 30 338 on a spring field high # with a brake highly figured walnut kicks like a baby compaired to the Weatherby
Oh yeah ?I don't even have to hold my 338-379 Weatherby accu-mark rifle. Just rest it on a sand bag, and shoot it with one hand.
Well, I just had to weigh in.The .300 Weatherby is a tried and true long range round, fantastic for elk. Deadly for sure out to 600 yards. Superb with the Nosler 210 grain Accubond. What, if anything, is better? Gentlemen, state and explain your opinions, please.
I shoot a 300 wby and a 7mm rem mag amongst others. Love them both. I agree with your comments above, the &'s are easier to shoot, but I do great a big smile when my 300Wby booms and that plate reacts like someone has hit it with a bus!This is just me, but to 600 yards I'd take one of the Big 7's each and every day over the 300Wby.
My reasons, I refused to have a gun over 8.5 pounds (sling, rounds, scope) and I refuse to use a brake.
Added to that the Big 7's will have roughly 10 % less recoil, they'll shoot roughly 10% flatter, they'll penetrate roughly 10% more and they'll drift 10% less.
All in all to me and for my uses I'll go Big 7 each and every time over the big 30's.
Lastly, shooting them from less than perfect field positions will also push me to the Big 7's as well.
I used to shoot a ton load of chucks each summer, only used my big game rifles. My Big 7's were infinately easier for me to stay on my game with. Again, I'm not using heavy guns and I won't use a brake.
Just my way and my thoughts...
And here we goI also built a 30 338 on a spring field high # with a brake highly figured walnut kicks like a baby compaired to the Weatherby