What constitutes “inherently accurate “?

[Orange Dust]

@bigngreen, cartridges actually...
but chambers is close enough...

OK, @FEENIX, but don't you think that the bulk of the heavy lifting has in fact been done by wildcatters, and it's actually rare or never for the manufacturers or "researchers" to start from scratch on something?

In fact, the only time they jump in nowadays, is when someone else is on to something already, AND they know they can make a buck.

I don't have a problem with any of their reasons though. It's their deceptive advertising I have issue with.


Y'all should be able to accept the fact that when someone says "inherently accurate", it doesn't mean it'll shoot better than anything else out there, because if it did, I'd certainly expect them to make those wild claims of smaller groups, and adjust their "standard" accordingly... which hasn't been done. Therefore, the term "inherently accurate" applies to every cartridge it was ever used with, agree or no?

So again, I think you need to recognize the term "inherently accurate" as snake oil. It doesn't differentiate anything from status quo in the cartridge world.

To quote FEENIX..... "BAM"

 

[wildcat455]

Twenty pages of this? Really?

Lmao!!

Ain't it great!!

Actually I spend less time on here when it's cool enough out to shoot or there's something in season.

 

[wildcat455]

To quote FEENIX..... "BAM"

What's that?
Like a mic drop?

Lol. Don't get excited, either I'm highly dense and in desperate need of enlightenment, or this ain't over...

Hahahah!

 

[Orange Dust]

Lmao!!

Ain't it great!!

Actually I spend less time on here when it's cool enough out to shoot or there's something in season.

Me too, However, I've been known to sit in a deer stand and talk to you all when it is slow...

 

[Orange Dust]

What's that?
Like a mic drop?

Lol. Don't get excited, either I'm highly dense and in desperate need of enlightenment, or this ain't over...

Hahahah!

How about "Hit the nail on the head " for the unenlightened...

 

[bigngreen]

@bigngreen, cartridges actually...
but chambers is close enough...

You really need to read closer, I said chambering, the cartridge is the assembled component and is several individual conversations to see what each part brings to the table.

 

[wildcat455]

Hope no one thinks any of this is personal.

@bigngreen hope you'd still build me a rifle if I needed one!!

 

[wildcat455]

You really need to read closer, I said chambering, the cartridge is the assembled component and is several individual conversations to see what each part brings to the table.

Yes sir. My bad. Chambering.

 

[FEENIX]

@bigngreen, cartridges actually...
but chambers is close enough...

OK, @FEENIX, but don't you think that the bulk of the heavy lifting has in fact been done by wildcatters, and it's actually rare or never for the manufacturers or "researchers" to start from scratch on something?

In fact, the only time they jump in nowadays, is when someone else is on to something already, AND they know they can make a buck.

I don't have a problem with any of their reasons though. It's their deceptive advertising I have issue with.


Y'all should be able to accept the fact that when someone says "inherently accurate", it doesn't mean it'll shoot better than anything else out there, because if it did, I'd certainly expect them to make those wild claims of smaller groups, and adjust their "standard" accordingly... which hasn't been done. Therefore, the term "inherently accurate" applies to every cartridge it was ever used with, agree or no?

So again, I think you need to recognize the term "inherently accurate" as snake oil. It doesn't differentiate anything from status quo in the cartridge world.

Wildcatters do what wildcatters do because they see the potential "gain" in the cartridge they are modifying/improving upon. For whatever reason, most often than not, the concept starts with the cartridge, and the rest follows.

Again, I "never" disputed your side of the argument and I thought I made that clear. Which means I acknowledge both sides of the argument. Is that too hard for you to accept?

Having said that, thanks for keeping it civil.

 

[FEENIX]

To quote FEENIX..... "BAM"

Thanks!

 

[FEENIX]

What's that?
Like a mic drop?

Lol. Don't get excited, either I'm highly dense and in desperate need of enlightenment, or this ain't over...

Hahahah!

We could all use some enlightenment.

 

[Orange Dust]

Yes sir. My bad. Chambering.

Me too. Reading too quickly

 

[MudRunner2005]

I see my moon comments got deleted.

 

[Orange Dust]

I see my moon comments got deleted.

XXX You in Trouble Now!!!!!