memtb
Well-Known Member
I can't resist commenting here.
If you can be transported via vehicle or horseback to your shooting position, and no hiking/carry is required ……it's your business what you hang on the end of your barrel. Then a "suppressor" can be totally justified.
If you're going to be hiking/hunting several miles per day, possibly in somewhat vertical terrain at altitude……portability in length and weight is at a premium. That's no place for a suppressor.
I also believe that this is no place for a brake!! Yes, ear protection can be worn…..but, is impractical in many hunting situations.
In that day of hunting, you may cover several miles of hunting, and you will likely be in varying terrain….. shooting could be measured in feet to many hundreds of yards. I strongly suspect that no one here has a rifle that recoils so badly that a brake is necessary for one or two shots fired in a hunting scenario! I prefer to hunt without ear plugs, muffs , ect……brakes simply won't work! memtb
If you can be transported via vehicle or horseback to your shooting position, and no hiking/carry is required ……it's your business what you hang on the end of your barrel. Then a "suppressor" can be totally justified.
If you're going to be hiking/hunting several miles per day, possibly in somewhat vertical terrain at altitude……portability in length and weight is at a premium. That's no place for a suppressor.
I also believe that this is no place for a brake!! Yes, ear protection can be worn…..but, is impractical in many hunting situations.
In that day of hunting, you may cover several miles of hunting, and you will likely be in varying terrain….. shooting could be measured in feet to many hundreds of yards. I strongly suspect that no one here has a rifle that recoils so badly that a brake is necessary for one or two shots fired in a hunting scenario! I prefer to hunt without ear plugs, muffs , ect……brakes simply won't work! memtb