Seeking empirical evidence to support or refute powder/seating-depth nodes

[sjt18]

I think "science" is used to answer the why. Why does the earth orbit the sun? Why did the apple fall to the ground? Curious people, much smarter than I, have been asking why? for thousands of years and then applying science to find an answer. I am just looking to do the same with my reloading methods.

Science never answers "why" questions. I think the word you might want to use is "how".

It works... so "how" does it work.... or maybe "what makes it effective"? Probably not going to be profitable though if folks turn to parsing sentences.

I think several of us get exactly what you mean. I wish you were getting more helpful responses. I could use some of that wisdom too.

 

[RichCoyle]

Equalizer,
I meant animosity towards the OP. I practice what he preaches.

 

[Csafisher]

Nah, I get what you were saying. The joke is on you.

The joke is thinking that old reloading techniques work better for old guns…..

 

[Equalizer]

Equalizer,
I meant animosity towards the OP. I practice what he preaches.

I believe you sir and the only reason I quoted your post was that you summarized his goal. I was referring to the less than cordial responses that had no informational value, other than a possible glimpse of that person's lack of character.