Seabeeken
Well-Known Member
Just ordered the quickload update download
EXACTLY. why sale powder if you don't want the reloading community to have the data needed. They give their data for free,I would like Hodgdon to get that data to QL. It is a valuable tool for getting a load started.
Like reloading manuals, they are simply a guide, use with discretion.i guess i can see their point, however bullet manufacturers DO USE QL data for starting loads. they have sent me QL data before i bought the program. starting loads IMO.
I agree that hodgdon reloading center is great but for people with uncommon loads it gets more difficult and I don't have an uncommon cartridge. Just have a not normal loading for factory bullets.Like reloading manuals, they are simply a guide, use with discretion.
Berger Tech Support still free QL load recommendations.
Hornady no longer provide free load recommendations outside their reloading manuals.
Hogdgon reloading center is still an excellent source for baseline load development.
Huh, my results have been just the opposite.
I agree that hodgdon reloading center is great but for people with uncommon loads it gets more difficult and I don't have an uncommon cartridge. Just have a not normal loading for factory bullets.
You have to do what you need to do. As with anything else, YMMV.Huh, my results have been just the opposite.
In fact I have found their reloading center data to be anemic trash on many loads.
That's a BS cop out. Their (Hodgdon's) data has errors, as does that email (gramatical). If they were truly that concerned with accuracy, they would proof read both!
It is not my place to judge their stance or correct his grammar. Everyone is entitled to their opinions. If you have a problem with it, you can take it up directly with them. It does no good complaining here.That's a BS cop out. Their (Hodgdon's) data has errors, as does that email (gramatical). If they were truly that concerned with accuracy, they would proof read both!
This is nothing new though, it's always been this way. It's always taken longer for QL to model the Hodgdon powders, and the initial results derived for Hodgdon powders have always been less accurate or more quirky as a result. It's a good thing we can "true up" Hodgdon powder in QL.
American powder companies are notorious for NOT sharing powder data. I also understand Hodgdon is getting away from PB Clermont produced powders and trying to make them in the USA. At one time, Ramshot powders all said "made in belgium" but not anymore.I would like Hodgdon to get that data to QL. It is a valuable tool for getting a load started.
Is it worth getting the update or maybe wait. ThanksAmerican powder companies are notorious for NOT sharing powder data. I also understand Hodgdon is getting away from PB Clermont produced powders and trying to make them in the USA. At one time, Ramshot powders all said "made in belgium" but not anymore.
I installed the 4-2024 quickload update a few minutes ago and no ramshot grand listed