My thoughts on solid copper bullets and in comparison to other bullet types.

No I'm not dialing I'm holding on hair to 500

Ok 4 moa, I'm still holding on hair@500
4 moa at 500 will completely miss low if you hold dead on. Even at the top of the back your likely to either miss, or hit low and wound the animal. A average deer is probably no more than 20in in total depth at the chest if not less
 
I literally just measured the chest depth of a 10 pointer I shot that weighed 218 dressed weight and from spine to the brisket is 18 inches. So no your not holding hair at 500 yards
 
If I hold on hair at along the spine@500 I'm going to miss ?
If you're not holding 1.1 mil or 3.9 moa on your reticle, or dialing for it, yes. If you have a reticle without proper holdovers, and you're running something like a duplex reticle, and just aim high like you're saying, I will stand by my claim that you'd mostly likely miss at 500 yards, especially if you're also not properly adjusting/holding for wind. I mean zero offense here. I'm only trying to help.
 
Man that's smoking fast. Have you shot anything with that load butterbean? I'm curious about bloodshot or meat damage. I've been really impressed with the hammers. This thread is very really good, let's try not to get off track
 
Man that's smoking fast. Have you shot anything with that load butterbean? I'm curious about bloodshot or meat damage. I've been really impressed with the hammers. This thread is very really good, let's try not to get off track
It's not going off track. We're trying to prevent wounded deer from running around and clean quick kills is always #1 priority
 
Man that's smoking fast. Have you shot anything with that load butterbean? I'm curious about bloodshot or meat damage. I've been really impressed with the hammers. This thread is very really good, let's try not to get off track
I don't believe it's necessarily off track if it's one of his reasons for that bullet being better. Plus I'd hate for someone to miss a shot.
 
Top