Leupold mark 5 3.6-18

[Threejs]

Anyone have real world experience on these scopes? I have ran nightforce for a long time but am thinking of trying one.

Tracking?
Glass quality/clarity?

 

[WeiserBucks]

Tracking?
Glass quality/clarity?

1-Low grade dog food
2-Really nice.

 

[Ed AO]

1-Low grade dog food
2-Really nice.

So. …. Old Roy?

 

[WeiserBucks]

So. …. Old Roy?

Much worse

 

[WeiserBucks]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.longrangeonly.com/forum/threads/leupold-mk5hd-scope-review-by-ryan-furman.8777/&ved=2ahUKEwj4253Jl7CKAxVHM9AFHUCrEuQQFnoECBMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0hQCamlX3el81Gxfs1IigA

Plenty just like this one

 

[Threejs]

I see Gunwerks putting them on rifles but I have never had any luck with leupold. My NF have been perfect every time

 

[WeiserBucks]

@Huntnful ordered a MOA Mark 5 and it came with MIL internals. How does that abortion get passed QC?

 

[Recon$$]

Owned two. Sold one solely to help move a rifle as a package. Great scopes. Banged one up good a few years and performed great. Still own that one. Go for it. It's not a vx5/6... far nicer.

 

[Huntnful]

@Huntnful ordered a MOA Mark 5 and it came with MIL internals. How does that abortion get passed QC?

And I had to send it back TWICE to get it fixed. First time they told me it was fine.

 

[Huntnful]

If I were to buy another Leupold, it would be the new Mark 4 with the 34mm tube though. I had 3 Mark 5's. One had the wrong internals and the other 2 lost zero bouncing around in the side by side. Before the side by side zero loss though, the scope was solid and I killed some deer with it

 

[WeiserBucks]

If I were to buy another Leupold it'd be a pair of shooting glasses for eye pro.

 

[Recon$$]

Guess I got couple good ones.

 

[Mike D Texas]

The two I have have held zero and tracked properly out to a mile and back several times.

I have NF NX8s and an ATACR but the eye box and glass is better for me on the MK5s.