As in all things, balance!I didn't say not to shoot them, I said that eradication should not be a goal.
As in all things, balance!I didn't say not to shoot them, I said that eradication should not be a goal.
Yeah, cause they never lie!Rely on the F&W recommendations.
The wolves just need to be managed better. At my friend's ranch in Wyoming, they spread little boxes around, that when the coyote or wolf investigated it, it sprang open and shot cyanide in their face. Those darn things are just dangerous. I get that the dogs kill the calves and sheep, but other methods are needed.Living in Montana, this is an issue I'm quite familiar with. Though I don't hate wolves, I do not think that they should have been reintroduced. Here's why, elk and other ungulates already have a lot to contend with in today's world. Before settlers came to America, wolves had a useful place. But today with growing infringement on habitat, grizzlies, black bears, cougars, hard winters, hunters, chronic wasting disease, and disrupted migration routes, elk have a lot to put up with. And the moose suffer even more, in addition to lack of low intensity wildfires and logging to produce better browse. I would not ever advocate to exterminate an animal from an ecosystem unless it was invasive; but wolves have many more mouths to feed and much are more successful predators than other competitors. Not to mention wolves are difficult to hunt, so harvest may not be enough to control their numbers since populations have exploded beyond the initial management plan. If it was decided to exterminate wolves from the lower 48 I would not oppose it. Maybe I'm naive but that's where I stand.
No, I deal with stupidity and liars with harsh consideration and intolerance as they are far more dangerous than any wolf.This guy is hiding in his mom's basement trying to get a reaction out of people. His elementary logic and poor grammar should let us know that we're dealing with someone who is a little special. We should probably take this into consideration before we judge the poor little guy too harshly.
How about you let the hunters take care of any overpopulationAt 20K, it sounds like you were over-populated. Biologists in Idaho say that wolves account for less than 1% of the total predation of Idaho elk. While cougars account for the largest predation, at only 2%. Life mortality accounts for the biggest loss, as cow elk have achieved a longer life span, and it has come of age.
https://www.cdapress.com/outdoors/20181122/increasing_idahos_elk_numbers_is_predator_management_goal
https://idfg.idaho.gov/sites/default/files/seasons-rules-big-game-elk-2017-2018.pdf
you are just a dumb ***At 20K, it sounds like you were over-populated. Biologists in Idaho say that wolves account for less than 1% of the total predation of Idaho elk. While cougars account for the largest predation, at only 2%. Life mortality accounts for the biggest loss, as cow elk have achieved a longer life span, and it has come of age.
https://www.cdapress.com/outdoors/20181122/increasing_idahos_elk_numbers_is_predator_management_goal
https://idfg.idaho.gov/sites/default/files/seasons-rules-big-game-elk-2017-2018.pdf
Ranchers are only interested in their herd numbers, just like RMEF is only interested in elk numbers.