I understand for the sake of time and components that holding off load development until the barrel speeds up and settles down is less than Ideal for your situation or most people, but it is recommended.
How about doing another "Satterlee" test over an OCW Target. 3 shots at each charge weight and use the avg velocity of each charge weight. This will both show you what you want to see on the chrono as well as on paper. ES is too sporadic to chance basing everything off of one reading. That is similar to what I do. I see a lot of new reloaders fixated on the high node because of the math but in reality many find greater load stability and accuracy in a lower node. Just something to think about.
And I'll say this because I feel like I offended you on Rokslide. Everything I say is with love. Just trying to help a brotha out
Joe
No man, no butthurt at all, if I gave that impression it was not on purpose. I'm grateful for everyone's inputs.
Looking back, I do wish I'd have loaded up 3 rounds at each charge weight base on that ES.
I also think I may have ran with a less than optical seating depth as I wanted to load as long as practical. I had 2 good groups. .60 moa .060 jump when fire forming and testing seating at same time. But I went with a slightly worse grouping depth of .010 as even that 73gr was a slight compressed load in virgin brass.
I think I will revisit. 060 jump with a quick 2 or 3 groups...from there, I'll run another charge weight test.
Based on the previously pictured charge weight test, would you start the test any higher on the charge weight, or go all the way back to 74?
Thanks again for the inputs, its starting to click, slowly.
Can say how frustrated I'll be if I find out I missed the node all together by only loading one at each charge
....best to remove all doubt though and run it again like you suggest.