dougduey
Well-Known Member
This is with 1x fired Hornady brass and 215M primers. This was shot off a bipod and rear bag......I was too lazy to go back to my truck and get my front bag, so the load may be even tighter!!
That must be the go to powder !View attachment 173068
This is with 1x fired Hornady brass and 215M primers. This was shot off a bipod and rear bag......I was too lazy to go back to my truck and get my front bag, so the load may be even tighter!!
Never heard him say that. For sure with 300 rum and 7 rem mag but depending on powder with 6.5 CM and PRC ???
That's impressive speed along with accuracy. I have not tried R16 yet, I have a couple of cans, looks like I need to get busy!View attachment 173068
This is with 1x fired Hornady brass and 215M primers. This was shot off a bipod and rear bag......I was too lazy to go back to my truck and get my front bag, so the load may be even tighter!!
I couldn't get ahold of any Varget (which is what Steve recommended first), so I went with RL16. It's very temp stable. Steve said it was a great alternative to Varget. Proof is in the pudding.That's impressive speed along with accuracy. I have not tried R16 yet, I have a couple of cans, looks like I need to get busy!
I couldn't get ahold of any Varget (which is what Steve recommended first), so I went with RL16. It's very temp stable. Steve said it was a great alternative to Varget. Proof is in the pudding.That's impressive speed along with accuracy. I have not tried R16 yet, I have a couple of cans, looks like I need to get busy!
Very good info. Thanks. Soon I'll be continuing my testing also. Have start all over on 300 Rum. Had new barrel put on on other things. Others I'll continue with different powders and try the loads that worked well with magnum primers to see if helps. Can't hurt !I talked with Steve a while back ( when I called to order the bullets ) and he told me that the magnum primer "gets the bullet out of the gate a little quicker" and this facilitates the initial engraving of the bullet when it hits the origin of the rifling. ( I was talking with him about the 280 Remington and the 143 grain HH.) We also discussed the matter of using a powder that is very close to 100% load density ( nearly filling the case, that is ) and I brought up something that I had learned years ago from another bullet manufacturer. That guy had told me that with monolithic bullets that have driving bands of any type, one should use a powder that is just a tad faster than what he might ordinarily prefer for his cartridge/bullet weight. Steve said that he agreed with this concept, and this was also because of the idea of getting the bullet moving a bit more quickly into the rifling. He recommended H-4350 over H-4831, but also told me that I ought to try both. His preference of the slightly faster powder was not huge, nor was it engraved in stone. I haven't proceeded with the project, so I haven't reported back to him with the results. I'm really looking forward to working with these bullets, and now that hunting season is behind us, that should happen pretty soon. I plan to stick tightly to my notes from the conversation, since this guy appears to know his onions.
Ditto on both .I've been very satisfied with RE26 and the 124HH in my 6.5 Creedmoor (velocity & accuracy) but now you guys have me thinking about starting over with RE16. Reloading is a hopeless addiction.
I hate to say it but some of my big bores don't like the light CEB either. Could get mine to shoot the 375gr .375 at all. Went to the 400gr and bam worked great. I think you may be over spinning them with only having the seal tight band.