Can you provide something authoritative mentioning the need for 3 fireforming shots for accuracy?
I never said nor implied that you have to fully fire form for accuracy.
I suggest that full fire forming can take brass to a stable consistent form, which I prefer as a baseline for my cases -because I do not FL size.
You can measure to see this yourself if you like. It's a measure of H20 capacities.
A good indicator of individual case character also, as it shows the witches in your batch. The cases that just aren't springing back the same as the others.
Then I have to remind that if your FL sizing cases, your capacities are not matching anyway. You might as well forget the effort, as your demigods have.
There is a reason FL sized cases can shoot well, despite so many flaws.
It's due to peak pressure flattening, from energy consumed to expand cases more. Many see this as new brass producing lower MV/pressure than fire formed brass. Similar pressure peak flattening occurs with the 'competitive' 6PPC load, as it's so high as to be deep into diminished returns. Diminished returns equals diminished variance of returns, so point blank competitors can throw charges instead of measuring them, and shoot just fine.
Basically, both are forgiving conditions to powder.
So why would I choose to not FL size?
--Case Life--
I want my cases to last ~forever,, while measuring and shooting exactly the same over the long run.
I can do this, with all the accuracy ANYONE could expect from my hunting guns, with planning that includes minimal sizing.
Can't do it with FL sizing, as there is too much changing with every cycle, and it can't be undone..