I don't know how the law enforcement in Montana and the other grizzly states handle it. In Alaska, it's a non-issue to kill a bear that's in your face. There's a lot of maulings up here and a lot of bears. They're refered to as DLP shootings. Defense of Life or Property. They damage property up here and they can be shot. Law enforcement won't even refer a case to the prosecutors if their findings at all match the story from the shooter. And no jury would convict anyway if there was an even half plausible story.
As the maulings become more common in the states, I suspect prosecutors will realize the difficulty in getting a jury to see things the bunny-hugger way.
I use any advantage they offer to increase my odds of winning. Because losing carries a heavy cost.
As the maulings become more common in the states, I suspect prosecutors will realize the difficulty in getting a jury to see things the bunny-hugger way.
I use any advantage they offer to increase my odds of winning. Because losing carries a heavy cost.
Last edited: