That's I think number 9 I know of this fall so far, there has been more grizzly issues this year than ever!
Too much pepper. Not enough lead. Time to reduce the bear density.
That's I think number 9 I know of this fall so far, there has been more grizzly issues this year than ever!
Too much pepper. Not enough lead. Time to reduce the bear density.
He's a Montanan, just brushed of two grizzly attacks, hikes out and drives is butt to the hospital and call his girl to see what's up.
Wonder if he wishes he'd pulled the pistol first? That's I think number 9 I know of this fall so far, there has been more grizzly issues this year than ever!
A very important thing to contemplate while discussing alternatives for bear defense is this: in order to "stop" a bear with with a bullet you are going to have to hit his Central Nervous System (Brain or spinal cord) which is an exceedingly small target well disguised with fur and fat and well protected by muscle and bone. Your chances of doing this are very small. It happens so quick and you are likely to be in shock and awe mode (on the receiving end!). Now your chances of placing an eventually fatal wound are much greater but the bear will have plenty of time before his or her demise to chew and claw you to mincemeat.
But in your last moments at least you will know "you got that sucker too".
So here are some observations
Most sprays have a maximum of 40ft and minimum of 15ft that's a small window. they hold enough for 8seconds of spray or 3 2.5sec. bursts but realistically a charging bear (assuming 30mph) is traveling 44fps will be in that 40- down to 0ft window for only 1 second. Also the sprays work by irritating the eyes and respiratory system but the spray sprays out in a fairly wide pattern and a bears eyes and nose are only a few square inches combined so how much is he really going to get running through that cloud for 1 second? but even assuming it does get in his eyes at the 40ft mark and he shuts his eyes he wouldn't have to much trouble running that last 40ft with his eyes closed and knocking me down [/U]and once he's on top of me the spray is about useless atleast it seems unlikely that I'd be able to reach around and give him an eye full, my only hope is that he starts feeling sick and leaves.
bullets can be deployed at 30yd at 20yd at 10yd at 5yd at 2in.
and in the case of a handgun from underneath the bear with the muzzle against fur as in the case someone mentioned much earlier in this thread.
Based on this recent Montana bear spray failure story, a bullet or two into this sow during the first mauling may have spared the man the second mauling. Advantage - bullet.
From the victim's description, this sow came so fast she blew right thru the bear spray from 25 feet on in, unimpeded. Sow protecting cub attacks are often very fast and hurried. The sow is worked up into a tither. The faster it eliminates the threat, the sooner she feels better about life.
The local Alaskan man who suffered a severe brown bear mauling 20 years ago here on Alaska's Kenai Peninsula saved his life and ended the mauling while his face was being crunched, still in the brown bear's jaws. He emptied the last four rounds from his double action revolver, a S&W 44 Mag, into the underside of the boar as fast as he could pull the trigger. He aimed by feel, muzzle jammed into underside fur. The bear ceased its attack as soon as the revolver was emptied. It then released the man's head from its jaws, and ambled away at a fast walk. I think I described this mauling earlier in this Thread as the man told it to me. Which raises another bear spray versus bullets consideration... how would you spray a bear in the face with bear spray when your face is in his mouth? Another advantage to the bullets.
..........That boar began feeding on Treadwell while he was still alive. He dominated Treadwell like a house cat on a mouse. There's an audio on YouTube of some of the actual Treadwell mauling, about 2 minutes out of the 6 recorded minutes. Put's you so close to the mauling it's unnerving................
Happened a couple of days ago apparently:
https://www.instagram.com/p/BLFtYIFja0t/
Grizzly bear attacks Todd Orr in Montana twice and he posts bloody Facebook video warning - CBS News
Here's his facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/todd.orr?hc_ref=SEARCH
Are there not folks in legal proceedings right now or very recently, for what, to most of us, appears to be legitimate self-defense against a griz? Gonna be harder to make a case for that in much of this ridiculous, detached from reality, political correctness culture when you kill a bear 25 yards from you, even if it has been charging you from 80 yds. Might have a better chance to plead self-defense if the evidence shows the bear was only 10 yds away. Follow? Guess it's better to be alive and face that potential legal issue than be dinner, etc..
Guess I wouldn't make a very good reporter...sure didn't scoop this story for you guys. Shoulda checked the thread first. I guess the 'instant notification by email' isn't working that instantly...hadn't seen anything about this thread for a couple of days, so figured this was new news.
Combined with the recent bear spray fail in the double mauling in AK and many other stories from up in AK from guys who live in high density griz/brown bear areas and anecdotal evidence otherwise, I am left more than ever wondering about bear spray. 'Statistics', so-called, indicated you are better off with bear spray. But I think those 'statistics' pack alot more variables in them than the researches have uncovered or care to uncover. I pack both a large bore pistol and bear spray in bear country, but I think I'd be going for the big bore pistol at my side first.
So here's a question, unless someone else has already asked it and I'm late to the conversation (again): Given that this bear apparently started charging at 80 yds, at what point do you start shooting to kill? At what yardage, if you do kill/maim said bear with bullets, are you thrown in jail because some 'well-meaning' people/judge says the bear was bluff charging and you shouldn't have shot so soon? See what I'm getting at? Are there not folks in legal proceedings right now or very recently, for what, to most of us, appears to be legitimate self-defense against a griz? Gonna be harder to make a case for that in much of this ridiculous, detached from reality, political correctness culture when you kill a bear 25 yards from you, even if it has been charging you from 80 yds. Might have a better chance to plead self-defense if the evidence shows the bear was only 10 yds away. Follow? Guess it's better to be alive and face that potential legal issue than be dinner, etc...
This guy, did everything 'right' (except for packing a gun at all...oh, and he's a hunter, so two strikes against him)...right down the line of what our bloated cradle to grave government would want him to do. And, he is fortunate to be alive.