The hammers, in a Creedmoor will spill all of that extra velocity by 600yds. It would not be my choice.
That's the spot!Figured I'd add this...as I mentioned earlier this was 143ELDX out of my 6.5 Creed at 550 yards. I practiced out to 700 all summer and into fall. I walked a card board box out from 100 to 700, stopping every fifty yards and put three rounds into the target at each stop. I wanted a no bs, real dope sheet. I made this shot a first light, no wind, and it was around 30F at 4000ft off my deck, on bags. And yes I'm pretty proud of this.-WW
There is nothing wrong with the 6.5 cal you just need the wright bullet with the wright impact velocity the 6.5 cal has a very high SD BC and is acc driven fast enough it is great but the 6.5 Creed is runing out of Steam at 600 yds if your bent on shooting that distance with a 6.5 get a bigger cartridge the cal is fine but still would not be my choice for Elk I built a switch barrel 6.5 prc 300 wsm just for a future Elk hunt the 300 with a Hammer bullet of appropriate weight for maximum distances I might shoot will be my choice I think the op did his best with what he had but was underguned with the 6.5 Creed it does have it's limitations at longer distances bullet choice impact velocity and shot placement three main factors everytimeI have benched my 6.5CM for anything larger than a coyote at this point. I have tried the 143 ELD-x and 156 Berger EOLs and have seen nothing but inconsistent results. I have lost 4 whitetails all within 200 yards off this caliber within the last 2 years. Its great at killing paper, I am sure there is a bullet out there that it will perform well with, but I am done looking for it. I have many other calibers to use, but not being confident in my equipment to do the job just does not cut it when trying to keep shots ethical and filling the freezer.
To the OP, I don't blame you for trying it. There is so much back and forth on this round....lots of success and a lot of the failures I am sure can be placed on the shooter and not the round. I am not trying to hate on the 6.5 CM, I have two and the are tach drivers and fun to shot. My experience with its hunting reliability has been less than satisfactory though.
Well it's more about the lowest FPS that the bullet will function for me. Yes right around 600 depending on what hammer is about where I find the cross between heavies and the hammers. But both are usually slowing to a speed that won't open reliably anyhow.The hammers, in a Creedmoor will spill all of that extra velocity by 600yds. It would not be my choice.
I never said there is anything wrong with the round. I just have had bad experiences with it. Now every time I use it hunting and something does not drop immediately I doubt myself no matter how solid the shot was or how well I ranged and checked dope. That's neither fun or encouraging as a hunter. I do not mind tracking at all, but when the bullet goes in and leaves a tiny hole, then sheds the jacket and sends shrapnel everywhere you get no blood trail to follow. With components being as difficult as they are to find right now its easier to bench the rifle and go with what has been working for me for the last 20 years vs working up new loads on various different bullets.There is nothing wrong with the 6.5 cal you just need the wright bullet with the wright impact velocity the 6.5 cal has a very high SD BC and is acc driven fast enough it is great but the 6.5 Creed is runing out of Steam at 600 yds if your bent on shooting that distance with a 6.5 get a bigger cartridge the cal is fine but still would not be my choice for Elk I built a switch barrel 6.5 prc 300 wsm just for a future Elk hunt the 300 with a Hammer bullet of appropriate weight for maximum distances I might shoot will be my choice I think the op did his best with what he had but was underguned with the 6.5 Creed it does have it's limitations at longer distances bullet choice impact velocity and shot placement three main factors everytime
That looks like most Bergers I have recovered, but all have had massive damage internally. I have found that a shot higher in the chest cavity doesn't bleed as much as a shot lower down as well, or at least doesn't start bleeding nearly as quickly as it takes time for the chest to fill with blood (my hypothesis, which could be wrong), like poking a hole near the top of a cup rather than the bottom.I never said there is anything wrong with the round. I just have had bad experiences with it. Now every time I use it hunting and something does not drop immediately I doubt myself no matter how solid the shot was or how well I ranged and checked dope. That's neither fun or encouraging as a hunter. I do not mind tracking at all, but when the bullet goes in and leaves a tiny hole, then sheds the jacket and sends shrapnel everywhere you get no blood trail to follow. With components being as difficult as they are to find right now its easier to bench the rifle and go with what has been working for me for the last 20 years vs working up new loads on various different bullets.
Here is the last round I recovered. 156 Berger Elite Hunter @2650 fps out the tube. Its hollow.
I dont understand need to shoot elk with 6.5 at 700y.@RebelGuard I commend you for the honesty! Regardless of the dumpster fire this thread will turn into, you have developed valuable data for yourself! I will say we have had great success with 6.5 calibers 140-156 class bullets from 2700-3000 FPS on elk all the way out to 700 yards.
The common denominator in all of our success? Great bullet placement (regardless of bullet construction). All of our less then favorable experiences came from marginal hits. Those results happen with almost any caliber, so its a mute point - these kinds of threads always stir up drama, in the end - I wouldn't take too much to heart from the feedback you get off this thread!