The Oregonian
Well-Known Member
I think the same could be said about many things - people have different opinions on what it takes to kill or put a bullet on target (speed vs BC, bullet weight, etc). And it doesn't mean that you can't kill an elk below 1500 or deer below 1000, but it does mean, for many people, that below 1500 is marginal for elk. I think this experience is anecdotal evidence rather than empirical but would support the 1500 being marginal.@The Oregonian,
Lots of folks don't consider foot pounds of energy a valid measure. For them your numbers are irrelevant. Apparently the numbers are irrelevant for one of the elk.
It is not black and white but it is directionally accurate in my mind, at least in general and on average.