I can't believe this surprises anyone
It's literally tracking perfectly with the PRC legacy.
Look at the creedmore, basically zero improvement over the .260 Rem
Lets not forget that the 6.5 PRC capacity is about 1.5 grains over the already optimized 6.5x284 for maybe a 25 fps gain..
The 300 PRC is identical to the 300 WM, and lags behind even a saami 30 Nos.
I didn't say the first 2 cartridges were better, only that they weren't improved upon.If the .260 was better why did the 6.5 Creedmoor crush it despite a 10 year head start?
If the 6.5-284 was better why is it only primarily a handloaders cartridge with almost no factory rifles offered?
If the 30 Nosler was better why does is have a 3.4" COAL and a 10 twist barrel same as the 300 WM?
The fact of the matter is that Hornady found a niche in offering factory options for what handloaders and custom rifle builders have been doing for years. Instead of tweaking existing cartridges to make them work better for long range shooting they simply made their own.
The 260 is better, Put a long throat on it and a fast twist, It will out perform the cm wonder cartridge anyday of the week, And so will the Swede. I do beleive the 6.5 PRC is better than the 6.5-284, Only because it does not have a rebated rim, And it is a more efficient case.