wilkup
Well-Known Member
I miss all the formulas Marshall Stanton used to have over on the Beartooth page back in the day. The wound channel and penetration calcs were really helpful.
Looks like you can see the bullet base through the case wall. DANG, that's alot of lead. Might have to get me some!I pick the gun up Friday and decided it was time to get some rounds loaded up in preparation. These big bullets are just sexy!
You definitely can! I swung by the fun store with my dummy to be sure would chamber/fit in the cylinder before starting this evening's craft session.Looks like you can see the bullet base through the case wall. DANG, that's alot of lead. Might have to get me some!
Actually, I think you'll be surprised at the penetration at a lower velocity. I've used Keith style 290gr hardcast SWC and they were outstanding at lower velocities for penetration in my 6.5" inch S&W M-29... Good luck Cheers5 shot over the chrono gave me an average 805fps.
805
805
807
805
804
Way slower than expected but very consistent. Very interested to see how penetration on water jugs goes.
Actually, I think you'll be surprised at the penetration at a lower velocity. I've used Keith style 290gr hardcast SWC and they were outstanding at lower velocities for penetration in my 6.5" inch S&W M-29... Good luck Cheers
If I remember right, his thoughts were there negative affects at 1200+Agreed! In talking with several times with John Linebaugh, he through extensive testing, determined that a slower moving hard cast bullet of equal caliber/weight/metplat would penetrate deeper than the same bullet pushed at a much higher velocity.
I don't remember exactly what the numbers were. memtb
If I remember right, his thoughts were there negative affects at 1200+
What weight do you recall?From what I remember doing a lot of research on this years ago 1200 fps was the optimal velocity for Heavy hard cast bullets.