Wyo Task Force - Nonres Comments!

Every NR who is against this wants to turn it into a land or money issue.
How about thinking of it as a game management issue, like it or not there forced to manage hunters plain and simple. Better get used to it or stay home.

The game doesn't know if it's a non-res or res shooting it. So unless they are proposing to also drastically CUT tags across the State then the game management argument doesn't hold water.

As far as I can read, the amount of overall tags will stay the same?
 
Maybe the wardens are tired of being called 1000 times by land owners every season about entitled trespassers that think just because they bought a tag, they can go where they please and do whatever they please?
 
The game doesn't know if it's a non-res or res shooting it. So unless they are proposing to also drastically CUT tags across the State then the game management argument doesn't hold water.

As far as I can read, the amount of overall tags will stay the same?
You dont get it, more residents equal more people which equal more competition for tags as residents, so you give residents more tags less NR tags simply math.
 
Another negative that will come out if 90/10 passes in Wyo as the same thing will likely happen in Colorado. You can bet that Colo residents are going to complain when up to 35% of limited deer, elk, and antelope tags are issued to nonres. The real losers are the nonres!

I'm a Colo res and don't support this in Wyo just as I don't support it in my home state of Colo. It really bums me out that nonres hunters have applied for tags and paid high pref pt fees for up to 25+ years and are screwed! Not only that but nonres support local community revenues. Here in Colo small off the grid towns like Craig and Meeker in NW Colo get an incredible amount of revenue each year from nonres. The same is true in small towns in Wyo.

There are a lot of nonres that live in states where there are very few big game species options other than whitetails. 90/10 will cut their opportunity in 1/2. Young hunters just starting out may never catch up applying and paying high $ pref pt fees for the opportunity to hunt muledeer, elk, and antelope.

Wyo residents have the opportunity to draw and hunt with up to 12 big game tags/year. Wyo res can also hunt elk and deer each and every year in general units. You want to talk about opportunity....Wyo res have plenty! If they don't fill their freezer there is something definitely wrong!

Anyway, there are a number of different options that the Task Force probably haven't even discussed yet that should be considered before cutting 1/2 of the nonres high demand limited tags with 90/10!
 
. First you say this
How about thinking of it as a game management issue.
Then when informed it's not going to change the number of tags. You change your tune and say this.
You dont get it, more residents equal more people which equal more competition for tags as residents, so you give residents more tags less NR tags simply math.
Seems to me you are just arguing for the sake arguing. Because it doesn't seem you take any of the many valid points from either side into consideration.
Example you never commented on my post about 48%of WY being federally owned.
Do you think a resident of any state that has federal land owned by all Americans should basically hold exclusive rights to use it ?
 
Tag allotment has nothing to do with managing game on federal land, you wanna turn this into land management
 
Every single state manages there game herds that has federal land, the same as state land
 
Listen im gonna make one last comment then this thread goes on ignore.
ITS CALLED STATES RIGHTS!! to do as they seem fit whether you like it or I like it PERIOD! no different than me telling California, Wisconsin, Wyoming etc what they should be doing.
 
I could care less what happens to residents or non residents that hunt or fish Wyoming. I have never put in for a hunt or going to. But when you look at who spends the money to hunt and fish this state around 77% of license sales are non residents.


Wyoming Game and Fish Commission Revenue
The Wyoming Game and Fish Commission's (Commission) revenue is generated from fish and wildlife constituents, associated federal funding sources, grants, donations, and from Commission owned property. The Commission receives no State General Funds. Revenue can be broken into five main categories and is reflective only of revenue that can be expended.
Updated Sept. 2020
page1image3193941936

License Revenue
This includes hunting and fishing licenses sales, conservation stamps and fees, preference point sales, boat registration fees and the Super Tag program.
page1image3274720576
$56,363,841
Federal Aid (PR/DJ)
Federal aid includes Pittman-Robertson (PR) and Dingell Johnson (DJ) funds from federal excise tax on sporting arms, ammunition and fishing and boating equipment. Funds are apportioned to state wildlife agencies for con- servation work, hunter education programs, operation of archery and shooting ranges, and sport fisheries work. The Commission must match funds derived from PR/DJ at a rate of 25% state and 75% federal.
$19,400,000
Grants
Grant funds awarded to the Department from conservation and other partners to achieve specific outcomes that benefit the Department's mission.
$6,400,000
Interest
Interest generated from Commission accounts.
$2,700,000
Other
Revenue generated from Commission owned property, magazine publication sales, Access Yes donations and other miscellaneous items.
$3,700,000
Total$88,563,841
The Wyoming Game and Fish Commission's yearly revenue is approximately $88.5 million. This includes hunting and fishing licens- es, conservation stamps and fees, preference points, boat registration, Super Tag and Federal Aid. The majority of the revenue, $75.7 million or 85%, comes from hunters, anglers, recreational shooters, and boaters.
Of the $56.3 million that comes from license revenue, approximately 77% comes from nonresidents.
Prior to the current fiscal year, the Commission received approximately $800,000 annually from the State General Fund for license recoupment to offset the revenue lost from free and reduced price licenses. This year General Fund support was eliminated to aid in the State's current financial crisis.
The Commission's budget is based on needs and identified priorities. When revenue exceeds the budget, the Commission places those funds in a reserve similar to a personal savings account. This reserve is for emergencies and allocating funding to significant projects, including capitol construction, wildlife crossings and wildlife research.
All funds tied to license revenue must be controlled by the Commission and spent on approved wildlife related activities to meet the requirements of Federal Aid.
page1image3274873344

Wyoming Game and Fish Commission Revenue
Updated Sept 2020
page2image3192645184

Current License Revenue
Product TypeNonresident SalesResident SalesTotal% of Revenue from Nonresidents
Antelope$ 6,658,986$ 916,345$ 7,575,33188%
Archery$ 377,700$ 232,868$ 610,56862%
Bighorn Sheep$ 99,760$ 19,608$ 119,36884%
Black Bear$ 176,429$ 191,102$ 367,53148%
Deer$ 8,062,641$ 1,949,569$ 10,012,21081%
Elk$ 8,295,614$ 2,818,404$ 11,114,01875%
Fishing$ 5,317,794$ 2,181,663$ 7,499,45771%
Furbearing/Trapping$ 11,703$ 105,600$ 117,30310%
Game Bird/Small Game$ 342,314$ 362,298$ 704,61249%
Gray Wolf$ 28,798$ 36,372$ 65,17044%
Moose$ 126,848$ 37,392$ 164,24077%
Mountain Goat$ 47,564$ 12,312$ 59,87679%
Mountain Lion$ 105,835$ 78,744$ 184,57957%
Wild Bison$ 134,818$ 49,884$ 184,70273%
Wild Turkey$ 138,084$ 93,566$ 231,65060%
License to Capture Falcon$ 2,241$ 1,209$ 3,45065%
Fur Dealer$ 3,705$ 864$ 4,56981%
Taxidermist$ 1,446$ 14,904$ 16,3509%
Applications$ 1,888,125$ 778,915$ 2,667,04071%
Conservation Stamps$ 899,156NA
Preference Points$ 12,091,618$ 101,983$ 12,193,60199%
Watercraft Registration$ 655,3400%
Super Tag$ 1,141,900NA
Tags and Permits$ 466,980NA
Other Licenses$ 90,062NA
License Agent Commissions- $318,938- $384,144- $703,08245%
License Agent Commissions not resident specific- $82,140NA
Total$ 43,593,085$ 9,599,458$ 56,363,84177%
page2image3275888432
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top