Canadian Bushman
Well-Known Member
JE
I think you might be a place off on some of your decimals. Ive never seen a 5 millionths indicator (.000005).
One micron is the finest resolution typically used in the machining industry and that is .000046.
.1 = 1 tenth
.01 = 1 hundreth
.001 = 1 thousandth
.0001 = 1 ten thousandth - finest resolution mesurable on most simple geometry
.00001 = 1 hundred thousandth / 10 millionths - beyond most grinders tolerances
.000001 = 1 millionth - impossible resolution of measurement with anything but lights and lasers in vacuums.
Very high end grinding and honing will generally assure uniformity within .00002 and dimensional tolerancing to +\-.00005. Even this is very expensive and time consuming. Most grinders will run +\-.0002 pretty regularly with a uniformity inside .0002.
Check out gauge pin certifications for more info - http://www.deltronic.com/literature/Deltronic-Gage-Guide-2014.pdf
Tailstock alignment is something i pay a lot of attention to because it will negate the hard work that was used to align the barrel when the reamer is traveling on a vector that is not in line with the headstock ( even with floating reamer holders ).
It is also extremely easy to change. If your foundation moves in your shop it can flex the ways and throw alignment out. If you take a heavy cut and it chatters, the machine can walk and alignment will change. If you tighten the lock more or less you can toss alignment. Over time the ways wear and alignment is different for every position across bed length. Hell sometimes the taper is ground crooked.
This is part of what urged me to start this thread. I heard guys drone on and on about how well they can idicate a crooked rod inside a barrel and then cram a reamer in a tailstock an shove it in a barrel. You will loose more tolerance on a chamber with a tailstock than you could ever gain by indicating that last .0001 out of a rifle barrel.
How many guys have checked the concentricity of the 30 deg grind in the back of a reamer? Lock that sucker onto a perfectly aligned tailstock and guess what happens.
Some things matter, some things dont. I want to spend my allowance of attention to every detail that matters and squander none on details that dont.
I think you might be a place off on some of your decimals. Ive never seen a 5 millionths indicator (.000005).
One micron is the finest resolution typically used in the machining industry and that is .000046.
.1 = 1 tenth
.01 = 1 hundreth
.001 = 1 thousandth
.0001 = 1 ten thousandth - finest resolution mesurable on most simple geometry
.00001 = 1 hundred thousandth / 10 millionths - beyond most grinders tolerances
.000001 = 1 millionth - impossible resolution of measurement with anything but lights and lasers in vacuums.
Very high end grinding and honing will generally assure uniformity within .00002 and dimensional tolerancing to +\-.00005. Even this is very expensive and time consuming. Most grinders will run +\-.0002 pretty regularly with a uniformity inside .0002.
Check out gauge pin certifications for more info - http://www.deltronic.com/literature/Deltronic-Gage-Guide-2014.pdf
Tailstock alignment is something i pay a lot of attention to because it will negate the hard work that was used to align the barrel when the reamer is traveling on a vector that is not in line with the headstock ( even with floating reamer holders ).
It is also extremely easy to change. If your foundation moves in your shop it can flex the ways and throw alignment out. If you take a heavy cut and it chatters, the machine can walk and alignment will change. If you tighten the lock more or less you can toss alignment. Over time the ways wear and alignment is different for every position across bed length. Hell sometimes the taper is ground crooked.
This is part of what urged me to start this thread. I heard guys drone on and on about how well they can idicate a crooked rod inside a barrel and then cram a reamer in a tailstock an shove it in a barrel. You will loose more tolerance on a chamber with a tailstock than you could ever gain by indicating that last .0001 out of a rifle barrel.
How many guys have checked the concentricity of the 30 deg grind in the back of a reamer? Lock that sucker onto a perfectly aligned tailstock and guess what happens.
Some things matter, some things dont. I want to spend my allowance of attention to every detail that matters and squander none on details that dont.
Last edited: