palerider3
Well-Known Member
You might consider the 7 SAW from west texas ordnance. Look it up. Impressive numbers
Hard to build a SAW on a magnum bolt face.
You might consider the 7 SAW from west texas ordnance. Look it up. Impressive numbers
My bad, didn't catch that part, only that he had a 7mm tube.Hard to build a SAW on a magnum bolt face.
Yes. My SAUM w/defiance deviant running 175's just a hair under 3.00 in the SAUM netting 2850 FPS max pressure w/reloader 23. (22 inch barrel)
hunting partner runs his 7wsm w/180 Berger's under a mild load of 4831SC right at 2950 FPS out of his Montana 1999 action. (24 inch barrel) I cannot member overall length offhand but definitely longer then sammi.
I'm stomping on the pedal for 2850 in the SAUM and he's @ idle w/his load out of the wsm. I'm sure with reloader 23 or 26 he could really bump up the velocity.
not exactly apples to apples with my shorter barrel but enough to gather a pretty good idea that the WSM runs away from the SAUM.
just our first hand knowledge here - not gospel. Everyone has their own experiences- just voicing what we have came across.
either cartridge is a winner in my opinion!
Please explain to me how that improves anything? The shoulder on the 7 is already farther forward than the 300. In other words 7 has shorter neck. I dont see hoew necking the 300 down improves anythi g unless you go with a much shorter neck, and go through all the headache of brass forming, possibly neck reaming, and then trimming and wasteing components to forform for what? Just my thoughts. I havent heard a single bad round mentioned in the thread. They will ALL do the job. Why make a lot of extra work.Since the OP loads, how about split the difference and build a 7MM-300WSM?
The shoulder is further forward on the 7 than the 300. A straight neck down of the 300 yields a slightly longer neck, and is a simple one step szing operation. Capacity is between the two. Also slightly thickens the neck which gives the opportunity to turn the necks to clean them up. No fireforming other than any other new brass. Brass is available anywhere. One of the easiest wildcats and solves the problem of brass shortages. Another plus is not everyone has one. Would be fun and practical.Please explain to me how that improves anything? The shoulder on the 7 is already farther forward than the 300. In other words 7 has shorter neck. I dont see hoew necking the 300 down improves anythi g unless you go with a much shorter neck, and go through all the headache of brass forming, possibly neck reaming, and then trimming and wasteing components to forform for what? Just my thoughts. I havent heard a single bad round mentioned in the thread. They will ALL do the job. Why make a lot of extra work.
Less performance, more work. I just bought lots of 7mm wsm. Can be done but other than oddity and brass shortage which may be ended, no good reason. Can make 7wsm from 300 wsm but requires fireforming etc.The shoulder is further forward on the 7 than the 300. A straight neck down of the 300 yields a slightly longer neck, and is a simple one step szing operation. Capacity is between the two. Also slightly thickens the neck which gives the opportunity to turn the necks to clean them up. No fireforming other than any other new brass. Brass is available anywhere. One of the easiest wildcats and solves the problem of brass shortages. Another plus is not everyone has one. Would be fun and practical.