When do you chamber a round while hunting?

[Pdvdh]

I understand what you are saying - it doesn't prove option C is unsafe or any less safe than B.

Prove to who? You? Mud?

God help us should that be a requirement.

 

[therifleman556]

I understand your position, but like it or not; he's got a valid point. Bypassing a firearms safety and injuring someone as a result is a sure fire way to surgically tie your hands to your ankles.

 

[FIGJAM]

Prove to who? You? Mud?

God help us should that be a requirement.

What evidence do you have to the contrary? I don't know you from Adam which makes your personal opinion meaningless to me. If you have some useful input and some personal experiences to support your opinion please share, I would love to hear them.

 

[MudRunner2005]

Another example of Mud helping out the membership. More factual error. Help requires understanding.

Mud also thinks semi-autos are safer with bumpstocks. A bumpstock with an AR for Christmas. Great fun for the little ones. Oh, I forgot! Bumpstocks are now illegal! Bummer... Let me know when you're again able to legally purchase one in this country Captain Mud. If you post another 100 times in the bumpstocks banned thread, maybe it'll make all the difference.

Now you're simply making up crap. But keep going on with your own stupidity and making yourself look foolish. Your strange obsession with the bumpstocks is beyond weird...I'm starting to honestly think you don't know how they work.

Also, I've never owned one, nor have I ever had the desire to own a bumpstock. I think they're cheap junk plastic, however, you're too self-righteous to comprehend that, despite me saying it about 5,000 times in that thread your referencing. Let's not side-track this thread, but just for future reference, you're not suppose to drink the bong water...

 

[can1010]

I agree completely. Nobody wants to see anyone hurt. But I would love to see one proven right or wrong in a true controlled environment where this can be safely tested.

that would be easy to test. take a firing pin and drop it on a bath scale and have someone watch how many pounds are generated.
remember an 18 lbs spring takes 18 lbs to compress.
I don't care how far you drop it from you will never generate enough force

 

[FIGJAM]

I understand your position, but like it or not; he's got a valid point. Bypassing a firearms safety and injuring someone as a result is a sure fire way to surgically tie your hands to your ankles.

Any more so than not using the safety or forgetting to use it, or accidently knocking it off? As soon as you or I chamber a round we take responsibility for that firearm.

 

[GregBFL]

I voted "B". Almost every place I hunt has wild hogs and I like to be prepared to shoot at a moments notice. I was hunting in some rather thick brush one time and had a 255 lb boar charge me at 15 yards.

 

[shaughn]

Hey......you started it....

 

[therifleman556]

I don't know you from Adam .

I'm Adam

. But keep going on with your own stupidity and making yourself look foolish.

Careful, you were doing pretty good at that yourself claiming firing pins don't protrude beyond the bolt face. I've proved otherwise but you'll never admit it.

 

[codyadams]

I don't feel like a revolver and a bolt action are the same thing. I get you are trying to draw a parallel there, but its different.

In what way is a firing pin resting on a primer different from a firing pin resting on a primer?

 

[FIGJAM]

In what way is a firing pin resting on a primer different from a firing pin resting on a primer?

The difference is in the exposed hammer on a revolver bro. Thats a big difference.

 

[therifleman556]

The difference is in the exposed hammer on a revolver bro. Thats a big difference.

I think he's arguing the mass of each part resting on the firing pin is very similar.

 

[Deleted member 48126]

This is what this thread feels like....

 

[Deleted member 48126]

Who's next to comment...partner?