ccsykes
Well-Known Member
I used to but since we can now hunt with suppressors, I only wear ear plugs when not hunting with my rifle.
I've just come back from New Zealand and many of their rifles are suppressed. Even the kids on smallbore ranges have suppressed means they dont have hearing damage and can hear range commands clearly. Safety First!I used to but since we can now hunt with suppressors, I only wear ear plugs when not hunting with my rifle.
Not exactly sure about the suppressor comments. To legally own one it is quite a process to go through with background checks and everything else. I mentioned that we can now hunt with them; thanks for the law change by our legislature and signed by our governor. I'm not sure why any hunt club or shooting club would be opposed to a gun friendly law. I believe suppressors should be common place and sold right beside the earing protection without any kind of government involvement, but that would stop a source of revenue for the government.
I would suspect that the reason just might be that the NRA competitive rules
3.16a states the sound suppressor is not an approved item.
It is not an approved item because it is a competitive advantage to have one on as it controls recoil and is considered a muzzle device. How does that have anything to do with the right and use of having one in the real world outside of a competition setting?
It all depends on the muzzle brake. Some of them are horrible for the shooter in terms of blast and noise and some are not. I've shot two versions now that actually seem to reduce the noise to the shooter while still providing very good reduction to both felt recoil and muzzle flip.J Mitchell135
Yes, the muzzle Brakes are ear busters.
But the reduced recoil allowing you to stay on target
is worth the cost of ear protection.
There are other ways to achieve the same result, but
they are far more expensive.
All is relative to the size of the pocket book.