dfanonymous
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2016
- Messages
- 2,401
I really was never coming from the professional standpoint.Is it really masking technique if the technique has changed. If you ask me if I think fundamentals are necessary, yes I do it's idiotic to ignore them. But we can't deny what these new triggers give to an average shooter that sees a range maybe 5 times a year. This is a good thing for our sport. Your job requires your focus and I respect that, but the average dude doesn't do what you do and never will. Heck the quality trigger might even give a man more confidence to make the good shot. We both know confidence in our abilities is paramount.
Not mad, it's more like rolling my Fxxx eyes cause some internet dude is calling me a POG, I guess it's a grunt thing and just realize they still love us too but can't get past the jeleousy that we get to ride in the helicopter all day.
The military training works but is also not perfect. Which is why there so many other schools we get sent to. I just was trying to give out a series of examples.
The issue that comes to mind is the other people. The new PRS guys are just the easier to pick on. The gear really does them no good when starting out.
Hunters are another group. Guys get a little jumpy in the bush when they spot that trophy or whatever.
To the point, as a personality on the internet, I don't care what people use or spend their money on. If a shooter is a plinker or someone only takes the rifle out before each hunting season, then that's not the crowd that really is going to be receptive to what I'm saying. I get that, and you're right.
While I'm not sure on the polling, I'd wager that a large portion of the forum takes or would like to think they take their shooting serious. So I throw it out there what I learned. It's no voodoo or a trade secret. Yes, in terms of confidence, I rather see a mild shooter do ok, then be concerned with learning if he's not a really concerned with learning.