So...would a small rifle primer be...inherently accurate?
-
If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here
What constitutes “inherently accurate “?
- Thread starter Big Cherry
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
- Status
MudRunner2005
Well-Known Member
Who's on first?
That's how stupid this is getting...
Well, you made it as such by complicating a simple statement unnecessarily.
MudRunner2005
Well-Known Member
Let's agree to disagree.
Last edited:
bigngreen
Well-Known Member
I think it's like most of this, if it matches with the powder and fill ratio better it'll be better.
bigngreen
Well-Known Member
This thread isn't about companies or marketing, I just don't get how every thread has to turn into the Creedmore hate show, don't care if it's based of an older chamberings with minor tweaks, infact I think that's the best way to ensure your going to be successful, to take something good and add to it and make it just a little better, that in no way takes away from an older cartridge and it's relevance in it's in history nor does it mean we can't revisit it and add a little twist ourselves from what we've learned from newer chamberings.
Creedmoor shooter
Well-Known Member
It's because some people apparently can't get over themselves.
bigngreen
Well-Known Member
I'm a hater of new things myself but dang I really try not to go of the deep end without at least shooting and working with something before melting it down in public.
How many guys, melting it down like my 5 year old at bed time have actually even shot one, I bet the number is small!!
How many guys, melting it down like my 5 year old at bed time have actually even shot one, I bet the number is small!!
Canhunter35
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2017
- Messages
- 3,167
Yeah, sometimes it's waaay below zero, just didn't want to run two types of brass but I've seen a few reports of issues so haven't bothered
HARPERC
Well-Known Member
Sometimes going back to review something in a thread is more interesting than the thread.
The fellow shooting the record group, said best results were after 8 firings on the case.
Last edited:
MagnumManiac
Well-Known Member
Haven't read past a couple of pages.
Inherently accurate is a gun rag term, there is no such thing, never has been and never will be.
ANY chambering can spray bullets or put them all into one hole.
Simple really.
Cheers.
Inherently accurate is a gun rag term, there is no such thing, never has been and never will be.
ANY chambering can spray bullets or put them all into one hole.
Simple really.
Cheers.
It is obvious that there is a clear separation on this argument. When there is an acknowledgement of inherent inaccuracy, there has to be an acknowledgement of the counter argument. There is always at least two sides of an argument, i.e., hot vs cold, up vs down, guilty vs not guilty, etc. That is the whole point of a six sigma. Plots of data points will fall from either side of the spectrum/set upper or lower limits for correlation analysis/relationship to prove/disprove hypotheses or phenomenon under study. Like it or not, believe or not, it is what it is.
- Status
