• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

What 25 calibers are yall shooting?

There are a lot of good suggestions here. I guess I'm weird. I try to keep all of my calibers in:
.224
.264
.308
But I reload for a ton of different cartridges within those calibers. I picked a small, medium, and large caliber to try to stick with. Mainly so if I buy a specific bullet to try in a rifle and that rifle doesn't like it, I can try it in a different rifle. I would stick with something in the .264 since you've already made an investment there. It just simplifies your reloading life.

Disclaimer - I do have some rifles outside of those calibers. But 80% of my reloading supplies fall within those 3 intentionally. Am I the only person who thinks like this? lol
 
I came on LRH to post an update about testing Factory Ammo in a Fast Twist 25-06 and saw this post.

There will be a couple Factory Rifles soon in 25-06 with 1:7.5" twist barrels. Like the rest, I figured we should get ahead of this as much as possible and help knock out the preliminary testing on what Factory Ammo might do in a fast twist blank.

We tested a 1:7" which should provide a worst-case scenario for any pressure issues that might arise from some of the hotter factory ammo offerings.

In the 7 types of ammo we tested we did not see bullet failures even at really high RPMs and we did not have any pressure issues to speak of.

to save some time I'm just going to copy the test from our FB post tonight with the pictures to follow in 2-3 posts.

While the 25-06 may not be the most efficient cartridge in the world, dies are readily available, brass is everywhere, and you will be able to shoot whatever ammo you want for short range varminting to true blue Long Range Hunting if you're launching the 131 ACE. In the post to follow this there will be energy graphs of the bullets shown in the lineup.

--

***25-06 Factory Loads Tested in 1:7" Twist***

Last week we shot 7 types of common Factory Ammo out of a 1:7" 25-06.

Since we recommend 1:7.5" for 25-06, this 1:7" test should serve as a worst case scenario for our goal of pressure testing factory ammo.

This range is 100 yd indoor range that charges about $35 per hour. If you can catch this place during the slow hours a guy could get a decent amount of quality testing done. This testing was done sharing the bench with a 458 Socom, a lot of ARs, and other hunting rifles - that is only to say, take whatever accuracy you see here and add a charitable margin to it.

The 1:7" twist barrel and SAAMI reamer shot all of the seven types of ammo with zero reportable pressure issues and satisfying accuracy for a bull sporter barrel. After the first few groups the barrel stayed very warm and was pretty hot to the touch near the end.

Again, this may not serve as the best accuracy testing, but it definitely leans towards the worst case scenario for Fast Twist, High Velocities, and hot barrels that contribute to bullet failure.

Of all the targets we saw zero bullet failures on the paper targets at 100 yds.

RPMS -
- 85 gr Federal Prem Nosler Ballistic Tip: 377,382 RPM
- 100 gr Fed Prem Nosler Ballistic Tip: 339,222 RPM
- 107 gr Hornady Internlock: 306,102 RPM
- 90 gr Winchester Expanding Point: 358,251 RPM
- 85 grain Winchester Supreme CT BT: 368,125 RPM
- 115 gr Winchester Supreme CT BT: 320,400 RPM
- 110 gr Hornady ELDX: 332,434 RPM
- 131 ACE @ 3140 fps: 322,971 RPM

Energy:
- 85 gr Federal Nos BT @ 3669 fps = 1100 # inside ~550 yds
- 100 gr Federal Nos BT @ 3298 fps = 1100 # inside ~550 yds
- 107 gr Hornady Interlock @ 2976 fps = 1100 # inside 575 yds
- 90 gr Win Expanding Point @ 3483 fps = 1100 # inside ~330 yds
- 85 gr Win Supreme CT BT @ 3579 fps = 1100 # inside ~550 yds
- 115 gr Win Supreme CT BT @ 3115 fps = 1100 # inside ~ 575 yds
- 110 Hornady ELDX @ 3232 fps = 1100 # inside ~675 yds
- 131 ACE @ 3140 fps = 1100 # a shade over 1100 yards!

Wind Deflection - ran at only 5 MPH!
- second best bullet 47% more Wind Deflection at short range to 700 yds
- most bullets with 90-100% more Wind Deflection at short range to 700 yds
- At longer ranges the effect is more pronounced (72% and 215%)

Hit Percentages on 6" Vital Sized / Coyote Sized Targets:

Please see the Shot Simulation image and zoom in to see Hit % for 6" targets. This simulation was ran with a 1 MPH Wind Certainty, which some guys can call and many cannot.

To simplify things, I like to think of this as how many successful coyote shots would you make if everything went perfect before you squeezed a round off.

I only ran the Hit %'s out to 900 yards to keep the Shot Simulation inside ethical hunting ranges and since many of the bullets listed apart from the 110 ELD X and the 131 ACE would not be useful beyond this range.

---

In essence, for the recreational shooter and hunter the Fast Twist 1:7.5" 25-06 Rifles that will be coming out in the next year should have no issues running factory ammo when the need arises. In some cases and for a lot of varminting and close range hunting uses, some of this ammo is very good!

You should be able to shoot these Factory Rifles with the shorter range Factory Ammo for coyotes and deer, but also load up 131 gr ACEs for Longer Range Hunting and enjoying target shooting out to and past 3/4 mile!

More testing to come!

My next range trip will be waterline testing 25 Creedmoor at 600, 800, 1000, 1300, and 1500 yards.

the group.jpg


Winchester Super X 25-06 90 Gr.jpg


Winchester Supreme CT 85 gr.jpg


Winchester suprme CT 115 silvertip.jpg

Hornady American Whitetail  117 gr Interlock.jpg


Horn 110 ELDX 3232.jpg


Fed Premium 100 gr ballistic tip.jpg


Fed 85 grain ballisrtic tip.jpg
 
Here you can see the energy differences on target out of these options!

The 131 ACE basically doubles your lethal range in 25-06 but when these Factory Rifles come out there's also the ability to run 3600 fps ammo for point blank coyote hunting too!

Best of both worlds - a win win.

Energy: Plenty of usefulness from Factory Ammo for many shots and respectable Energy on target at LONG Range with the 131 ACE

25-06 factory and 131 ACE ENERGY to 1700 yds.png

Short Range Wind - only 5 MPH:
25-06 factory and 131 ACE WIND SHORT RANGE.png

Long Range Wind Deflection - Only 5 MPH:
25-06 factory and 131 ACE wind to a mile.png

Hit Percentages on 6" Targets to simulate useful shots on Vitals or Coyotes:

This Shot Simulation was ran with an accurate rifle and a shooter who has 1 MPH Wind Call Certainty. I did not run the simulation further than 900 yds due to the fact that 6 out of 8 of these bullets are really out of gas and their useful range.

Only the 110 ELD X and the 131 ACE would need to be graphed farther but the trend is clear for these 6" targets.


factory ammo hit percentages 500 700 900 yds with recoil.png
 
And the factory rifles are? Or is that trade secret at the moment? Was it a result of your bullet coming to market or did the mfg(s) actually look ahead and see the trend coming?
 
And the factory rifles are? Or is that trade secret at the moment? Was it a result of your bullet coming to market or did the mfg(s) actually look ahead and see the trend coming?

That is a bit sensitive info at the moment due to the amount of testing that these guys will need to put in before releasing something, but it was a direct result of the 131 ACE and us talking with MFGs.

Of course there could be other players we do not know about, but the ones I am referring to, I have been in direct contact with and they are excited about the low recoil performance available for long range deer and elk hunting.

The first rifles will be in the $1300-2200 range. Over time this will come down as more options open up in 25-06.

Dominoes you know.
 
I'm sure the bullet came first... Now the manufacturers are following suit. Just like I said it would...Many years ago. But people told me I was wrong back then and said, "There's no market for a heavy .25 caliber with all the 6.5's already out there...Nobody would want it."

Well, look who's been vindicated once again. :D
 
I love that the OP was looking at short action chamberings and got 7 pages of long action recommendations. LOL

Any of the SAUM, PRC, SST or WSM variants would be great for a hotrod 25 in a short action and they'd all be ballistically very similar. Just pick the brass you like and go with it. The 25 Creedmoor, 25x47 Lapua, 257 Roberts and 25 Souper in all their various forms would be great for a more mild option. I've worked with the 25 WSM, 25 Creedmoor, 257 Roberts and 25 Souper and they're all good rounds, although the 25 WSM seems to be a little temperamental.
 
I'm sure this has been asked so forgive me if so. Have you crunched the numbers to see just how heavy & high B.C you can get out of a 10" twist? Is the 115 Berger the limit?
As for high-BC bullets currently available, I think it's about topped-out, but I know the 10" twist will stabilize up to a 120 grain bullet, but not sure how high of a BC form-factor you can get out of a 10" twist. I would like to see what Miles can come up with though for the 10" twist.
 
Which is more to the point of what I was asking. I know there's the 120 flat base soft points of the world, but let's see what he can do for the guys that aren't ready to rebarrel.

The next bullet we release later this year will be the lightest we will ever make for 257. It is as much tradeoff in weight: MV: BC as I can invest my $$$ in, but when the balance comes together it will outrun the 131 ACE to 1000-1100 yards.

It will not work in a 1:10" twist. The Berger isn't as purely efficient of a bullet as you could design for factory rifles, but it's a pretty good version of that type of bullet of course. Redesigning that type of bullet for 1:10" would be a lot of time and $$$ spent for a marginal increase in performance where the same amount of time and $$$ would yield a tremendous performance to rival 6mm and outrun 6.5 from short range to 1000 yards.

If I had unlimited funds, time, and access to our contracting capacity then sure, but have to knock a few other things off the list first.
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top