WildRose
Well-Known Member
Based on what?The bullet(s) worked. Deer dropped at the second shot and it's at the Taxidermist! But it's still too heavy for his rifle.
Based on what?The bullet(s) worked. Deer dropped at the second shot and it's at the Taxidermist! But it's still too heavy for his rifle.
Placement, Placement, Placement, and yes that includes taking into consideration the design of the bullet you are using.Everything in life is a compromise. ESPECIALLY BULLETS. BC, SD, WEIGHT, STABILITY. So many factors to consider and NO IDEA exactly what a bullet will encounter when launched.
In general the Barnes idea is lighter weight, hard construction for a balance of penetration and expansion. Most would go with the lighter TTSX in a 308. Also would kick less.
HOWEVER, if the 130 had hit the hip bone in that critter and not made it past the diaphragm, this thread could be about a lost animal.
Every bullet has a PERFECT niche. I think about how a bullet is going to perform WHEN I am making the shot.
For example, Deer is standing at 300 yds at dark in a small opening surrounded by dense cover and its fixing to rain. With ANY bullet I am going for the high shoulder. Same deer in short grass in the morning? With a Swift A-frame I'm going after the shoulder, a Berger? Ribs.
I take a second and consider PROBABLE bullet performance BEFORE I shoot. That's a MUCH BETTER time than afterwards on a forum
Back in the day when Elmer Keith was writing, there were no SUPER BULLETS. He leaned heavily towards long for caliber, high SD bullets. With conventional stuff I shoot the longest heaviest VLD I can and call it good. I let the SD do the work, not the construction. That is PHYSICS beating CONSTRUCTION.
With super bullets I would pull the weight back and let the CONSTRUCTION do the work.
Impressive! Wish I had your hunting resume!I shoot a 140 g TSX out of my 7mm-08 at 3000fps. It's a gun I bought as a sheep gun (6 lbs with scope, bullets, and sling). About 7 years ago shot a big moose with it at about 200 yards. The bullet went diagonally through the moose and was found under the hide of the off-side hindquarter...a perfect mushroom. I must say it expanded more than the one pictured in this thread, so maybe there's something to be said for speed, but you don't need a magnum.
Since then I've killed three more moose, several caribou, black bears, Dall rams, and mountain goats with the same rifle and bullet. The longest shot was 400 yards on a Dall sheep. The bullet blew right through and the ram dropped like it was struck by lightening. I have recovered one more bullet since then, also from a moose, also under the hide on the off-side, also a perfect mushroom. All the other shots on smaller animals were pass-throughs with great wound channels and exit wounds.
Admittedly, bang-flop is maybe more than can be expected on a moose, but two of the moose did just that and the other two went under 30 yards. Same for the other critters. None went far.
As far as hitting bone, I don't see that as a problem either. This year's moose was shot facing me. The bullet passed through where the first ribs meet the spine. It CRUSHED the ribs and spine, and continued on to liquefy the vitals. Needless to say the moose hit the ground right there and expired within seconds. I did find some copper fragments in amongst the bone pieces, but obviously most of the bullet continued into the vitals, although I never found it.
Ballistically there are better bullets, but terminally, in my experience, the TSX leaves little to be desired. I've shot moose with 175g Nosler Partitions out of my 7RemMag and they took longer to die.
"Too Much bullet" is a myth started long ago by people who were having a hard time selling their preferred bullet.I've been experimenting with the Barns 168 grain LRX for my 280ai. I'm getting 2900 fps with RL26 (24" barrel), and that's what I'm going to use for a late season cow elk hunt this year (January 1st through March 31st. )
Anyway, I've been looking at the mono's a lot because I'm thinking Oregon may at some point mandate them. But they are shooting very well, and should do nicely on a cow if I'm so fortunate.
For deer, or antelope. That bullet will be a bit much. Maybe the 145 grain LRX, or a good old Berger VLD.
They have no petals to blow off.Wild rose
Do the plains masters blow off the petals easily or hang on to them for better terminal effect?
I realise this is also dependant on a lot of factors. Impact speed and location etc.
Impressive! Wish I had your hunting resume!
A TTSX through the ribs can leave you tracking a deer for a very long ways. My neighbor a few weeks back was hunting with his daughter. She shot a nice buck with her .243 loaded with Barnes factory ammo shooting the TTSX.Yeah, 25 years living in three different areas of Alaska does add up. I didn't hunt before I came here, so it's a bit funny to note that I still haven't killed a mule deer or a whitetail.
Piggybacking on what Wild Rose said, I will add that more explosive bullets tend to drop animals in their tracks with vitals shots, but a mono bullet through the vitals still kills them dead, just not right there. The TSX tears a 1 to 2" would channel through the vitals and keeps on going. You may have a bit of tracking to do but that animal won't go far. Coming from an archery background I'm fine with that, and if you DO hit (shoulder) bone there's no worries with a mono but there will be with a fragile bullet. My feeling is shoot them in the chest with a mono or bonded bullet, and it's dead as long as the bullet expands, and the TSX always has for me. Like I said, if I were shooting over 400 yards I would take lower velocity/less expansion into consideration.
The only time I actually worry about shooting for bone to break the animal down is on a mountain goat or sheep that is near cliffs, or a bear near heavy brush. Then you have to do what you can to anchor them as much as possible. I'm sure there are other times when that's critical too (hogs maybe??)