I agree the PST looks to be a better option from what I have gathered. Now, how do I go about using a reticle likelike the EBR-2C? I have seen the reticle that gives the 1/2 MOA ticks and 1 MOA tick and that seems to be the easiest to use, but I feel like that is just due to my lack of understanding. Ok, so that makes sense about the SFP. So, to practice, if you were on 6x on your rifle, zero would be 1/4 MOA up and 125/1000 MOA to the left (I feel like this isn't correct...)? Also, what do you mean by correcting your offset? Does this refer to the yardage you are shooting and how to adjust the MOA to shoot this distance? So I now know why a first focal plane makes sense for a hunting application (I am allowed to use an illuminated scope in my state). So, 4-16x50 or a 4-16x44 scope is suitable for my needs. I know I keep asking this question, but why is MOA more friendly to a first time user? Is it because it requires less field calculation then compared to an MRAD scope? I liked the price point of the 4-16x50 PST Vortex I found, but was somewhat discouraged when I found that I am only able to purchase it in MRAD.