Quicksilver338
Well-Known Member
I sold my NXS to purchase a used 4.5-28 march last year for my 300nmi rifle. My instant thoughts were I want another one pickier parallax is probably just only gripe, but some scopes are just that way depending on their magnification range. It's something I do before any shot anyway. The glass and wide angle lens are amazing. Did a comparison to a 7-35 atacr in overcast conditions and the glass between both was nit picky to find differences. We also had a 3-15 TT and I couldn't say the TT was any better than the March. The one that sold me on the March was the snipershide test against the 5-25 TT, where it beat it for sun glare. This has hosed me a few times hunting so any advantage there would be a benefit.
I know guys who love their Kahles, I know guys who love their March. For me, a scope is primarily reticle first. You can have the nicest features in the world but if the reticle is something you can't work with then what's the point? You'll be happy with both, especially if you have never owned a nicer scope likes those. Find what one you think will work best for you and run with it based on ergonomics, weight, reticle, etc.
I know guys who love their Kahles, I know guys who love their March. For me, a scope is primarily reticle first. You can have the nicest features in the world but if the reticle is something you can't work with then what's the point? You'll be happy with both, especially if you have never owned a nicer scope likes those. Find what one you think will work best for you and run with it based on ergonomics, weight, reticle, etc.
Last edited: