Did you guys wanting MOA see this, https://marchscopes.com/scopes/d42hv56wfiml-2/ ?
-
If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here
Anyone using a March FX 4.5-28X52?
- Thread starter Huntnful
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
Huntnful
Well-Known Member
Yeah! Sweet scope! I'm just looking for something more compact & lighter with a capped windage.
I know this isn't the model you're asking about, but I'm starting to like the Compact 2.5-25x52 I tried for the first this past season. Good glass for the money and the weight. Took a good knock on some rocks when a buddy carrying the rifle slipped and fell. Held zero.
lancetkenyon
Well-Known Member
I have shot behind two different FX 4.5-28×52.
They are a great scope. Tracking was true out to 1151 yards, return to zero was perfect, size and weight is nice, glass is good and better than the 3-24×52, magnification range is great, still a little picky getting the diopter set up and perfect with the parallax.
Better than the 3-24×52 for parallax and eye box as well, I think due to the 6x erector vs the 8x. FOV is amazing with the new wide angle eyepiece. Feels like a 3x on the low end but closer.
I just wish they could have kept it in the 24oz weight range like the 3-24 instead of 30oz. It is now more like every other scope, and not a lightweight contender.
They are a great scope. Tracking was true out to 1151 yards, return to zero was perfect, size and weight is nice, glass is good and better than the 3-24×52, magnification range is great, still a little picky getting the diopter set up and perfect with the parallax.
Better than the 3-24×52 for parallax and eye box as well, I think due to the 6x erector vs the 8x. FOV is amazing with the new wide angle eyepiece. Feels like a 3x on the low end but closer.
I just wish they could have kept it in the 24oz weight range like the 3-24 instead of 30oz. It is now more like every other scope, and not a lightweight contender.
Last edited:
7.62 Gunner
Well-Known Member
Mine weighs 28 oz but I get your point, 24 wood be sweet.
lancetkenyon
Well-Known Member
Factory specs for the illuminated states 29.8oz. Is yours the non-illuminated at 28.7oz?
Huntnful
Well-Known Member
I look HARD at that scope. I just couldn't get over the uncapped windage. I'm just weird haha.
Thank you for the info!! 28-30oz was actually my goal weight for the optic, so that my rifle would be around 9.5lbs for shootability. It's a 300 NMI so a little weight will be my friend haha. Thank you again for for the insight!!
I just ordered one of the non illuminated FML-LDK models. About a 60 day lead time on them. Looking forward to getting my hands on one!
Marky_mark
Well-Known Member
You didn't want a tangent theta?
Huntnful
Well-Known Member
No I didn't. I did look at them though! In the 28-29oz range I just think the March had a better overall package than what TT has. Just for my personal preference
Marky_mark
Well-Known Member
lancetkenyon
Well-Known Member
March FX vs TT315M
1. More top end magnification
2. More elevation adjustment
3.
4.
Yeah, that is it...
Huntnful
Well-Known Member
Almost 90% more top end magnifaction
Wider FOV at all magnifications
Better Reticle than 3-15 LRH
Non-Illuminated option
These were MY selling points ^
The TT has possibly better glass and turret clicks? I just wasn't sold on a $3700 3-15 scope with a reticle I didn't like. Despite the other possibly better features. It's just a personal choice. I didn't say your TT was a piece of crap or anything lol.
Edit to say I did really like the TT had a locking elevation turret. That's super nice on a hunting rifle.
Marky_mark
Well-Known Member
lol i was looking at the same scope as you and i just went with the better turrets and glass for all the hunts that I was doing
Had too many hunts and travelling, that I could risk something being off
