• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Longest Handgun Kill

It is easy to see what kind of accuracy to expect when playing around some with reverse milling. Out to 400+ i would say that i have had an 80-90% success rate on antelope (within <1% to about 4 or 5% of lasered). I get a lot of opportunites to reticle-range them while out coyote hunting. There are a lot of factors that affect RR'ing. Magnification of optic, size of the "subtension unit" (the smaller the better), obviously how well u can guess the size of the tgt., how steady u are while ranging, atmospheric conditions and how well the edges of your target can be resolved. I always try for back to brisket since the angle of the game varies the least of all the positions (unless steep uphill or downhill). The tgt. should not be moving obviously, but i did get a good reading on an antelope doe this last spring that i'd RR'd at 362 and lasered 370 while she was loping along, using a mil-dot reticle that subtended 2.1 inch per hundred yds. between dots using a magnification higher than mil-cald .

Here's the equation in it's most basic form (inches to yds.)--

tgt size (") x range of reticle subtension measurement (yds.) / reticle subtension (") / quantity of gap tgt. occupies (decimal equivalent) = range (yds.)

...looks complicated but super-simple to apply. Here's how say a 15" buck antelope back to brisket would work with say Rog's fine plex reticle in the 3-12x Burris LER optic. I looked it up in the '06 + '08 catalogs and they both list the subtension as 5.4" plex post tip to plex post tip (PPT) @ 100 yds. @ 12x.

So just substitute the variables--

15 x 100 / 5.4 / 1.0 (buck brackets the PPT's at 100% or 1.0 subtension unit) = 280 yds. (we're rounding off here). Now recognizing that 15x100/5.4 is a constant of 277.78 we can punch that into the calculator's memory and finish the ranging chart--

277.78 / 0.9 (90% bracketed) = 310

0.8 = 350
.7=400
.6=460
.5 (x-hair)=555

Now we can actually check our math here by recognizing that the .5 subtension unit is actually 2.7 inch per hundred yds. since the x-hair is 1/2 of the total subtension between PPT's. So if the buck brackets 1/2 of 5.4 or 2.7 here's that equation using 2.7 now as our main SU--

15 x 100 / 2.7 /1.0 = 555, so it checks.

Now it should be easy to see here that beyond 350 yds. every .1 of a subtension unit is 50 yds. difference in range. IMO, this isn't enuf accuracy since we're really only capable of dividing a subtension unit, regardless of how wide it is, into tenths. We can attempt 20ths (.05), but that's gonna be pretty tuff to get that accurate really with the human eye...IMO. so in this case with this reticle i would stop at 0.8 SU.

OK suppose u want to set up a point blank range reticle ranging system while hunting. Most guys hunt with their optic on a lower power so might as well putthe lower power to use.

Now we know that as maginfication INCREASES reticle subtension DECREASES and vice versa (inversely proportional), so suppose our max. PBR for our load and tgt. size is determined to be 275 yds. Now at 275 yds. the 5.4 PPT to PPT subtension becomes 2.75 x that or 14.85 @ 12x. That really doesn't do us any good since we're already at the width of the game (15") and if we lower the power the SU is just gonna get wider. But we could also check the x-hair to PPT SU (2.7) to see how that would work. 2.7" x 2.75 = 7.4" @ 275 yds. But we have to get that measurement to 15" by lowering the power of the optic. Here's the inversely proportional equation--

7.4" / 15" = Xx / 12x

X = 5.9 power.

So now if we hunt with the optic set at 5.9x, and we get a quick chance at our buck, if he fits back to brisket between the X and PPT or is bigger then aim dead center and shoot. If he's a tiny bit smaller than aim a little high.

The End
 
Last edited:
Approximately 90 yards at a duck in a waterhole at a friend's ranch in Mexico, over 30 years ago.

Yes it was an irresponsible shot. I did not know any better back then.

Pistol was a Smith & Wesson K-22 in .22 l. r. with a 6 inch barrel.
 
Last edited:
Hi there Hunlee here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Hunlee has just return from a long absent from this forum!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!This being said Hunlee had put many rounds throu the 7-30 water Contender long ranger!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Deer an other animal will be in trouble now!!!!!!!!!!!!!

hunlee
 
Coyote 103 yards with a Berretta Neos U22. Put right in the brain by way of entering his open mouth while he was yapping away.

Whitetail 85 yards .454 cassul with weaver scope 250 grain jacketed soft point.

Sorry no pics.
 
9/25/09--Doe Antelope one shot clean kill at 875 yards with a XP 18" barrel 284 win 6.5x20 leupold. Bullet 168 Berger Hunting VLD 58.0 H4831sc.
Casper Wyo Ross
 
I can add a nice big 2x2 mule deer at 562 yds out in WY. Should have been 80 yds but we spotted each other at the same time ;-(
They had the advantage of at least 24 eyes to my two old ones ;-)
Sure does taste better than white tail too.
Maybe Matt can post some pics my lap top crashed - with some match reports and all the state shooter info on it ;-(((
 
Not long range by many of y'alls standards, but here is my 2009 Missouri Firearms buck that I shot with my 6.5x284 Super Striker at 274 yards. Used 130 grain Triple Shock at 2834 fps MV. Bullet hit him perfectly and gellified his heart and lungs and exited his off side. He walked about 20 yards and fell over. I am hooked on these specialty pistols (thanks SS308)
IMG_2520.jpg
 
Warning! This thread is more than 14 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top