I call B/S but who knows!!!! I'll keep shooting lead core bullets. I cut my own venison and don't use blood shot meat. The lead risk has gotta be lower than risks associated with growth hormones, steroids and antibiotics in store bought food!Is this a thing?? Sounds nuts to me, but a member of this forum is claiming its dangerous. I have checked with google and couldn't find anything substantive to support the claim.
Hell my brother and I used to see who could get the best tooth impression on 490 round balls till dad caught us!So from reading this I've decided probably shouldn't be eating those yummy paint chips from the window trim no more. But I really like the white ones
This article was originally published in Environment Health News. https://www.ehn.org/amp/about-environmental-health-news-2495507118Wild Meat Raises Lead Exposure
Tests by the CDC show that eating venison and other game can raise the amounts of lead in human bodies by 50 percentwww.scientificamerican.com
Switched to Barnes years ago. I recall a video of an xray of a deer shot with a lead core bullet and it looked like lead pellets all thru it. That convinced me. I'll try to find the video again.
Good luck with your paper, and I recommend an Irish single pot whisky.Me too! And of course, ear protection. Heck, I even wear gloves, eye, and ear protection when I mow or use any power tools. To me it is all about risk management.
I have the same stance. As noted, I really do not care what an individual does with the information being presented. This learner is in no position to criticize any individual's stance on the subject matter or anybody's empirical data as I do not have any personal published peer-reviewed research paper. I have nothing but respect for those that managed to have their work published (literature/article, thesis, dissertation) because it is not an easy endeavor. I have been working on my research study since June of 2017 and currently going through multi-level Academic Quality Review processes and Independent Review Board. It has been a challenging but rewarding journey and the ultimate prize is almost within reach.
After 4 hours of study time since getting off work, I think a well-deserved break is in order. Cheers to all ... be safe and God bless!
View attachment 199350
Note that we never actually see the data nor the p-values; it was clear that, unlike the null vs alternative hypothesis which someone, I believe, DNA Dave discussed so eloquently, they had made up their minds about the outcomes before the study was even finished. The "some suggest" means, we'd like to have science to back us up, but we don't. And, as you may know from my other posts, I have had uniformly good luck shooting Barnes bullets. I hunt ducks, not pheasants, so don't shoot lead shot either. I just hate junk science.This article was originally published in Environment Health News. https://www.ehn.org/amp/about-environmental-health-news-2495507118
Make your own opinion about them.
Remember: Where does the money that sponsor those studies come from? Who gets the benefit of the study?
This "study" failed to specify what bullets were used. Amax is not the same as Accubond. When you fail to identify the variables, that is junk science because it violates scientific method.
Good luck with your paper, and I recommend an Irish single pot whisky.
Yes, it has everything to do with it because the type of bullet determines how much fragmented lead is dispersed in the meat.LOL, the brand and model of he bullet isn't the salient issue.
Yes, it has everything to do with it because the type of bullet determines how much fragmented lead is dispersed in the meat.