1) Because you've lost all ability to interpret the written english language.
2) Your foregone conclusion that an animal lost with good bullet placement and failed bullet performance is somehow better than an animal retrieved with less than optimal bullet placement. Because you've imersed yourself in the belief that bullet placement is always more important than bullet performance.
You've expressed your position clearly: Bullet placement is more important than terminal bullet performance- unilaterally. Even though failed bullet performance, in and of itself, can result in the failure of animal recovery, with terrific bullet placement.
Another possibility. Bad logic... Delusion and bad logic typically share the same bed. But the inability to understand the obvious, even after it's been presented clearly and concisely, has me leaning toward delusionally happy in Never Never Land.
2) Your foregone conclusion that an animal lost with good bullet placement and failed bullet performance is somehow better than an animal retrieved with less than optimal bullet placement. Because you've imersed yourself in the belief that bullet placement is always more important than bullet performance.
You've expressed your position clearly: Bullet placement is more important than terminal bullet performance- unilaterally. Even though failed bullet performance, in and of itself, can result in the failure of animal recovery, with terrific bullet placement.
Another possibility. Bad logic... Delusion and bad logic typically share the same bed. But the inability to understand the obvious, even after it's been presented clearly and concisely, has me leaning toward delusionally happy in Never Never Land.