Is shot placement more important than bullets?

[FEENIX]

Again, the "NUT" behind the trigger is responsible for picking the right bullet for the intended purpose first.

 

[Pdvdh]

#1 Good bullet with correct placement.
#2 Good bullet with less than correct placement.
#3 Good bullet superior to less than than good bullet regardless of placement.

In that order, don't hunt with less than good bullets. Hunt with a less than good bullet and lose game animals.

Every hunter with a lifetime of LRH experiences will have less than optimal bullet placement, and likely multiple incidents of less than optimal bullet placement.

Bullet placement failures will exceed bullet performance failures over a lifetime of LRH, no matter the riflery skill level, with quality bullet selection.

 

[ButterBean]

 

[FEENIX]

View attachment 292715

Yep!

 

[coldboremiracle]

#3 Good bullet superior to less than than good bullet regardless of placement.

You lost me there boss, thats horse****.
good bullets in the guts arent going to to work better than a vital shot.

 

[Pdvdh]

#1 Correct placement with good bullet.
#2 Correct placement with less than good bullet.
#3 Less than good placement with good bullet.
#4 Less than good bullet in less than good place.

in that order, placement still more important than bullet.

Placement always more important? Perfect placement with failed bullet performance leads to game animal lost. Poor placement leads to game animal lost. Yet placement is always more important than bullet?

I didn't lose you. You're simply lost in delusions of choice.

 

[Pdvdh]

Let me help you find your way.

With identical shot placement, a good bullet is indeed superior to less than good bullet, regardless of the location of the identical placement.

You're so intent on manipulation to your preferred conclusion, that your interpretation of statements from others is now errant also.

Inhale deeply, hold breath, exhale slowly..

 

[FEENIX]

Let me help you find your way.

With identical shot placement, a good bullet is indeed superior to less than good bullet, regardless of the location of the identical placement.

You're so intent on manipulation to your preferred conclusion, that your interpretation of statements from others is now errant also.

Inhale deeply, hold breath, exhale slowly..

Yep!

 

[coldboremiracle]

Let me help you find your way.

With identical shot placement, a good bullet is indeed superior to less than good bullet, regardless of the location of the identical placement.

You're so intent on manipulation to your preferred conclusion, that your interpretation of statements from others is now errant also.

Inhale deeply, hold breath, exhale slowly..

Nope, I was with you right up till you suggested that a bad shot is better than a good one just because of bullet type.
nice try with the psychoanalysis tho.

 

[MagnumManiac]

#1 Correct placement with good bullet.
#2 Correct placement with less than good bullet.
#3 Less than good placement with good bullet.
#4 Less than good bullet in less than good place.

in that order, placement still more important than bullet.

Nope!
I do not, and will not agree with your order.

Cheers.

 

[coldboremiracle]

Nope!
I do not, and will not agree with your order.

Cheers.

Thats ok , you do you.

 

[Pdvdh]

Nope, I was with you right up till you suggested that a bad shot is better than a good one just because of bullet type.
nice try with the psychoanalysis tho.

Delusional. Consistently...

 

[coldboremiracle]

Delusional. Consistently...

So we are clear: Im delusional because I disagree with you? that a gut shot with a good bullet is better than a vital shot with a lesser bullet?

 

[Hand Skills]

To keep up with @phorwath you are going to need to up the critical thinking a little bit.

If you are honestly trying to foster communication and understanding, brush up on your logical fallacies, because you are "strawman"-ing his argument.