dan belisle
Well-Known Member
People keep forgetting the reason for the 6.5 CM was to fit longer bullets within the col requirements of short magazines. It isn't magic. Just a shortened (and therefore less case capacity) 260. - dan
yupPeople keep forgetting the reason for the 6.5 CM was to fit longer bullets within the col requirements of short magazines. It isn't magic. Just a shortened (and therefore less case capacity) 260. - dan
Thats a beautiful stockI should have said, I designed a wildcat, because the build isn't done yet. I don't want to hijack the OP's thread, as this isn't between a 7mm-08 and .308, but it gives an idea of what one can do with available components. If one wants to be unique and has plenty of 7-08 brass onhand, a 7-08 AI might suit the job perfectly. Or similarly, I've got friends on other forums that sing the praises of the 7x57 AI. That will keep things in a short action (potentially) and keep weight down. I would think it much easier to get 7-08 brass than 7x57. The 7x64 also fits the definition of between 7-08 and 308, but is very similar to the 280 Rem. Just depends on what brass one can find the most of. There was lots of 7x64 brass left lying around about a year ago, but Ibthink some guys got smart and grabbed it to build one. It is a long action proposition, however. For under $1500 (was just under $1000 until recently), you can build something unique and amazing in your own shop once you have a few tools, and can have your own chamber dimensions and even your own cartridge, if you want something that isn't available. See photo attached. This just came off the bench and shot it's first group Saturday. Only had time for a fouling shot and 1 group, which was 1/2" . Never built one with a good barrel and proper headspacing and bedding that wouldn't print under 1/2 MOA. Didn't have time to scrub due to thunderstorms overhead, but it's just one example. I could spend another $200 and have the bolt and barrel fluted if I wanted it to look really cool. Another $125 would get an aftermarket trigger in ounces. You don't have to spend $4000 on a Bartlein, Defiance, Bix & Andy, and Manners to shoot the eye out of a Pronghorn across a canyon... If you're punching paper at over 1000 on a regular in competition, then that's a different scenario entirely. Consider this option if you're looking to spend over $1000. View attachment 284629View attachment 284630View attachment 284631
True it was designed with a longer neck for longer bullets this allowing more case capacity BUT for short actions. The 260 was also built on short actions by Remington back in the early to mid 90s when it became the .260 but since, more guys are building them on long actions where more case capacity is available. With a 2.8 OAL, the CM would certainly offer possibly a bit more case capacity but with both cases using their most case capacity, the .260 will offer more available space. Not trying to pick fly **** out of pepper but it's just what it is.People keep forgetting the reason for the 6.5 CM was to fit longer bullets within the col requirements of short magazines. It isn't magic. Just a shortened (and therefore less case capacity) 260. - dan
It's very interesting that:
Creedmoor fans are correct when they say the Creed is "superior" to the 260 - when loaded with longer bullets at 2.800" COAL.
260 fans are correct when they say the 260 is "superior" to the creedmoor - when hand loaded to COAL longer than the standard SA mag box.
guys just like to post stuff to trigger others, I guess.
Some things just need to be spelled out because it's apparently not that simple. Being pretty non-biased about either cartridge, they both have an advantage the other does not. Pretty much the beauty of having a choice.It's very interesting that:
Creedmoor fans are correct when they say the Creed is "superior" to the 260 - when loaded with longer bullets at 2.800" COAL.
260 fans are correct when they say the 260 is "superior" to the creedmoor - when hand loaded to COAL longer than the standard SA mag box.
guys just like to post stuff to trigger others, I guess.
i am with you! very close. i am just tired of the voices that applaud the 6.5 and turn their noses up at the 260. when both are loaded in a short action the 260 has slight edge, but ,it is and edge. i would never suggest someone throw either out for the other, but ask first what is the intended use. the 260 is almost exclusively loaded from factories for hunting use. the 6.5 from the get go was loaded for long range match shooting, at a reasonable price, with match appropriate bullets. i for one like, own, and use both! if im hunting and want this type of round ,i pick up my 260, if i am match shooting i will use one of my 2, 6.5 creeds. another great round is the 6.5 x 55.Some things just need to be spelled out because it's apparently not that simple. Being pretty non-biased about either cartridge, they both have an advantage the other does not. Pretty much the beauty of having a choice.
Well I understand the lack of respect for the 260 since the arrival of the 6.5CM. It's the latest and greatest mentality. I own that mentality to some degree so understand. All that have owned and loaded for both do know the difference. Both are great cartridges.i am with you! very close. i am just tired of the voices that applaud the 6.5 and turn their noses up at the 260. when both are loaded in a short action the 260 has slight edge, but ,it is and edge. i would never suggest someone throw either out for the other, but ask first what is the intended use. the 260 is almost exclusively loaded from factories for hunting use. the 6.5 from the get go was loaded for long range match shooting, at a reasonable price, with match appropriate bullets. i for one like, own, and use both! if im hunting and want this type of round ,i pick up my 260, if i am match shooting i will use one of my 2, 6.5 creeds. another great round is the 6.5 x 55.
amenWell I understand the lack of respect for the 260 since the arrival of the 6.5CM. It's the latest and greatest mentality. I own that mentality to some degree so understand. All that have owned and loaded for both do know the difference. Both are great cartridges.