Terry Lightle
Well-Known Member
Longbow and wood arrows,54 caliber flintlock,and 223 or 22-250 for coyotes
Along with the 'get more people hunting' argument is the next sentence, 'we can't draw a license under the point system'.I think one of the greatest concerns the rule-makers have is maintaining and hopefully increasing participation in hunting, especially in younger age brackets. How those rule-makers choose to market those opportunities will and should continue to evolve from that perspective. And they should also consider such changes might be perceived by the old farts like me.
If there are enough customers or potential customers who want a special season where you can only hunt with a sharpened #2 pencil no greater than 8" in length, then such a season may become a reality (especially if some large pencil manufacturers that help lobby the state for it).
Personally, I feel like the primary challenges these special seasons offer is limited range to target, time to reload, etc. which in turn create a more challenging experience.
So I try to be accepting of the changes so long as they are not significantly lessening those fundamental challenges. But who and how we decide what challenges are fundamental is the tricky question (e.g., archery trigger releases, compound bow let-off, etc.)
Along with the 'get more people hunting' argument is the next sentence, 'we can't draw a license under the point system'.
I agree. My opinion is to get rid of all the various weapons seasons. There should not be different seasons for archery, muzzle, etc. If you want to use a particular weapon, then use it, but no special privileges just because you selected that weapon. So what if it's harder to get an animal with a bow than a 300WM, that's your choice, but no special treatment. Also where is ethical in primitive weapons which lack the accuracy or efficiency of modern firearms? Let's go hunting and wound a bunch of animals. Makes absolutely no sense to me to use a degraded firearm for hunting. Shoot paper with them instead of making animals suffer.Always been a divide and conquer issue in my mind. Cost us all in the long run.
NO! That is not what I'm saying. As man advanced so did his weaponry. The spear improved the rock, the bow improved the spear, the smooth bore muzzle loader improved the thunder bust, rifling improved ... , etc. Our ancestors used the best technology available during their lifetime. We should also use the best and not go backwards. I'll guarantee more deer every year are not recovered by bow hunters than modern rifle hunters as a percentage of each type. It's because most hunters do not practice in the off season, bow, muzzle and rifle, and bows need much more practice to shoot accurately and judge distance than a modern scoped rifle. Why do you think the military upgraded to scopes on most rifles now? It's because it's an advantage over swords, bows and arrows.So, what you're saying is that until modern firearms were invented all who hunted were unethical because they could possibly wound an animal?
I would be willing to bet there are more wounded animals with modern firearms than those primitive weapons. But, you're welcome to your opinion.
When you have an awesome weapon you can sometimes be overconfident,when you're under gunned I could see you being nervous and more careful. Now the other side of the coin with a lesser weapon it is easier to make mistakes so it can go either way really.CHOICES"Also, where is ethical in primitive weapons which lack the accuracy or efficiency of modern firearms? Let's go hunting and wound a bunch of animals. Makes absolutely no sense to me to use a degraded firearm for hunting. Shoot paper with them instead of making animals suffer."
So, what you're saying is that until modern firearms were invented all who hunted were unethical because they could possibly wound an animal?
I would be willing to bet there are more wounded animals with modern firearms than those primitive weapons. But, you're welcome to your opinion.
Good for you. You are by far an exception to, my guess, 95 percent of bow hunters. As I stated, most and I mean 90 percent of hunters do not practice shooting. I have talked to many in the various hunting clubs/leases I have been in over the last 50 years and the majority do not practice. I try to encourage them to practice and they are not interested. Sad, but true.I take a great amount of pride in getting so close to animals when I hunt so as to be able to kill them with a longbow.Think my average distance for bow kills is around 10 or 12 yards including a bull moose at 6 yards,a black bear at 5 yards and another black bear at 15 or so yards.Have killed deer as close as 5 yards with my longbow from the ground.Year before last killed a doe at 18 yards with my flintlock,if people would learn to do a better job hunting they would see it gets a lot easier to kill animals.I respect opinions above,but I will continue to hunt how I want as long as it is within the law.Glad I had my scoped 223 for the 15 yard shot on my last coyote.
Honestly, this view could be applied to any of the seasons. Why not only allow black powder cartridge guns for hunting period? Open sights only? I mean, I know guys who are competitive long range competition shooters with black powder guns and peep sights.When I started hunting in the early 60s there were "Seasons" for Big Game.
We had "Rifle", "Bow", and "Black Powder -Muzzle Loader"
Everyone knew what Rifle, Bow & "Black Powder -Muzzle Loader" was.
Over the years things have changed where I can't understand the meaning anymore.
Hunters wanted to change "Black Powder -Muzzle Loading from Black Powder into "Muzzle loading Smokeless Powder"
No Longer " Primitive Weapons" Like I was accustomed to. Black Powder Muzzle loading Flint lock or Cap along with a Bow & Arrow.
What is a "Primitive Weapon Anymore"??? We have Crossbows & AirBows to take the place of a Long Bow. Then getting into Muzzle Loaders they have taken away Black Powder and even Muzzle loading and replaced with Smokeless Powder.
The Primitive Weapons are now loaded from the Breach with a Smokeless Powder Charge, a Sabot or bullet that fits the barrel and an ignition system. Seems just like a CARTRIDGE.
Why have a Primitive Weapons Season when the new weapons that are used are the same as a modern rifle???
Just have Smokeless Rifle Season with loading powder charges and bullet at the breach with a primer or electrical ignition.
Why hunt with these imitation Primitive Weapons. Is it because Hunters can't hunt with Primitive Weapons???
In the 60s I hunted with a Hawkins 50 Cal flintlock. Yes difficult due to the "FlintLock" and also having to worry about the weather (rain). Still have my long Bow and Aluminum Arrows. Thought that was cheating having metal arrows.
To me it doesn't make any sense to have a Primitive Weapon season anymore. Well we can still have Bow Season with out the AIR Bow or Crossbow. Just call it Crossbow season.
Just an opinion from a former Primitive Weapon Hunter.