Rich Coyle
Well-Known Member
Great news!
Personally I think it still should exist but solely as an advisory agency to the congress and administration similar to the CBO and that congress should then be responsible to The People for the consequences of any regulations they pass by law.I think certain things dealing with chemicals and all of that should be controlled by the EPA, but they do not need to tighten their grip anymore than it is now. I am a big time fan and enthusiast of diesel trucks, and the EPA is killing all of these trucks with the emissions equipment. I do not support or condone "rolling coal" and all that, but the junk that comes on these trucks from the factory really chokes the engines up and does not allow them to be what they should. The MPG, reliability, cost of maintenance, all of this is heavily affected by the emissions equipment.
Same with the bullets, lead is a natural product of Earth, me shooting a lead bullet into the dirt isn't killing the environment. I shoot black powder competitively at the N-SSA, and our home range has been there since the late 1950s. Every year thousands of shooters compete and tens of thousands of pure lead bullets are impacting the hill along the backstop and the ground down range. We have never had one problem with anything down there, there even is a stream that runs behind the firing line and it has no signs of lead contamination and it has been tested. Nothing is going to convince me that lead is destroying the environment.
There's a whole lot of truth in this. There is no need however for federal regulation of public or private shooting ranges to address the problem.I also believe the '"lead phobia" is way overplayed, and is total BS with rifle/handgun hunting. I have experienced the adverse effects of lead exposure through inhalation with frequent, high volume handgun shooting in poorly ventilated indoor handgun ranges. Airborn lead can reach very high concentrations and is quickly absorbed into the bloodstream.
If the muzzle velocity is 2400'fps in the example I gave it is stable to the transonic stage not until it hits 2400fps.. Same with any other projectile if they are stable at the muzzle velocity they remain stable til they hit the window.I was referring to a previous post saying a 10 twist was stable down to 2400 fps. My point was that you would be limited to 600 yards, give or take, at that velocity.....Rich
If the muzzle velocity is 2400'fps in the example I gave it is stable to the transonic stage not until it hits 2400fps.. Same with any other projectile if they are stable at the muzzle velocity they remain stable til they hit the window.
I'm not disagreeing with that concept. I just feel f your going to a tight twist you should consider going left hand as well because now your introducing spin drift and jump in a more pronounced fashion. Under 1k means little but as you said once you stretch out past that 30 minutes of correction mark where every extra little bit is needed. You are getting charged for a custom twist anyway. Might as well do everything instead just going tighter. Gain twist would something else that needs serious consideration for elr in a smaller than 338 bullet. The fresh bite and accelerating revolutions of the bullet will help keep the bullet out of yaw better. Plus this will help with the pressure curve of very slow powders.Ok, I misinterpreted what you meant. sorry! I do think with Litz new data though that a 9 or 9.5 is a better way to go if you are ever to hunt at the ranges we hunt at now. He showed a substantial increase in b.c. with some bullets at nearer 2 SG.
I'm not disagreeing with that concept. I just feel f your going to a tight twist you should consider going left hand as well because now your introducing spin drift and jump in a more pronounced fashion. Under 1k means little but as you said once you stretch out past that 30 minutes of correction mark where every extra little bit is needed. You are getting charged for a custom twist anyway. Might as well do everything instead just going tighter. Gain twist would something else that needs serious consideration for elr in a smaller than 338 bullet. The fresh bite and accelerating revolutions of the bullet will help keep the bullet out of yaw better. Plus this will help with the pressure curve of very slow powders.
Boy long ,long thread. I am wondering about the .270 winchester,145 grain eld-x and reloder 26 powder data.Has anyone tried this combination yet?
Boy long ,long thread. I am wondering about the .270 winchester,145 grain eld-x and reloder 26 powder data.Has anyone tried this combination yet?
He should start about a grain below the minimum since the ELD-X is a heavier bullet than they used to develop their data.Have not seen any .270 145gr loads on here the whole time. Berger lists their 140s with RL26 on their online load manual. I would start at their minimum and work up.
Have not seen any .270 145gr loads on here the whole time. Berger lists their 140s with RL26 on their online load manual. I would start at their minimum and work up.