Kmccord
Well-Known Member
I have a 28N, I have tried IMR 8133, to me it was the same as Retumbo, but dirtier. I was trying it out with 180 ELDM, accuracy was no better for me than Retumbo.
Well that answers that then! Thanks. I do see it yielding similar velocity to retumbo but didn't know about the dirty burn. I use 8133 in a .300 win mag (very compressed under a 225 grain) but have never used retumbo. 8133 has been much easier to obtain for me but maybe I'll have to switch and see if my rifle is less dirty after!I have a 28N, I have tried IMR 8133, to me it was the same as Retumbo, but dirtier. I was trying it out with 180 ELDM, accuracy was no better for me than Retumbo.
it's 1/4" group that could easily be shooter, I agree just shoot it at distance and if it holds together let it be. 25 ES isn't terribleI hate to be the negative guy, but here goes.....Based on the shape of that group (straight vertical) and the ES, I would be very skeptical of it holding together at long range. I think you could go up in powder charge and bring that vertical down and possible decrease the ES numbers. I don't base anything solely on numbers, but at some point they become important. If it shoots good at distance on paper and repeats it's good regardless of the numbers IMO.
To keep consistent low ES I have found annealing and the neck brush are keyBrass prep for me re: single digit ES's
Anneal
Trim if need
FL size
Mandrel expand
Tumble
clean inside of necks with a brass bore brush
I have 7977 but unfortunately no 8133. Retumbo wasnt much different in performance when i tried it.No 28nosler experience…no one on here yet has mentioned imr enduron 8133. It might be what you want. Hodgdons load data shows it being a top performer along with h869 ball powder. It's slower in burn rate than h1000.