As for bullet selection (assumign proper twists)
If you wanna run a 150-170 bullet, run a Nosler
If you wanna Run a 170-185, run a 7 Rem Mag with the right twist
If you wanna run a 185-195, run a PRC.
Do you mean assuming SAMMI or CIP originally specified twist rate?
28 Nosler seems to be specified as 1:9
7 Rem Mag seems to be specified as 1:9.5
7 PRC seems to be specified as 1:8
However, not every rifle manufacturer sticks to that exactly. A builder doesn't have to use "proper" twist rate.
My Semi-Custom 260 and DTA SRS were built/bought before the 6.5 CM was created and have tighter twist than "proper".
The semi-custom 260 Rem is 1:8 like a 6.5 ManBun
so I get to use the same bullets as a Creedmoor but with a bit more powder. My 260 could even be a 1:7.5 or 1:7 but my notes, receipts and build logs are at the shop and I'm not. DTA used 1:8.5 on the SRS 260 barrel, so faster than OE 1:9 for the 260.
Creedmoor lovers, I get it, don't be haters. The "advantage" of a 6.5 CM over a 260 is twist rate. Make the 260 with the same twist and that "advantage" goes away. Sure, you can then go to COAL and just nit pick it to death. Boring.
Weatherby Mark V uses 1:8 for 7mm PRC and 1:9 for the Nosler and Rem Mag making bullet range the same for the Nosler and Rem Mag. They offer up to 180 Berger VLD factory load for the 28 Nosler. Interesting that for the 7mm PRC, Weatherby goes to the 177 Hammer Hunter but the 28 gets the 165 Hammer Hunter. Remember Weatherby "guarantee" sub-moa with Weatherby ammo.
A Weatherby Vanguard 7 Rem Mag is going to be original spec 1:9.5. Japanese adherence to specifications?
The point of all that is that bullet weight is not as tightly coupled to chambering as "proper" suggest. Any builder, be it factory, semi-custom or full custom can choose any twist rate for any caliber+chambering as desired. I certainly do.