Next weekLooks like that barrel is a trash can lol...feed it anything and it shoots.. have you tried this seating test at extended range? 3-500? Or even 200?
Bullet speed is slower for 4831sc.... burn rate is faster.... you are correct in your context... lolNo, its not! Look at a burn chart! My bad, wrong context I think.
To add to this, some of the loads on Hodgdon are within a grain of data and actual loads I worked up for my 7rem mag when i had it. The capacity is the same and the preasure limit is higher so theres not much reason not to go this route.A point of reference thats worked for me is to take the same load for a 7 rem mag and knock 2 grains out of it and work up. So if there is no data on the prc with your powder and bullet, but there is data for the rem mag with the powder an bullet. Pick a middle charge, knock out 2 grains and start there. It worked for me when there was virtually no data on the 7 prc out there.
Id run the 20" you want. at most you'll lose what 50 yards off of your extreme outter range? So for the price of a much handier rifle you might have to sneak from lets say 900yds n get to 850yds. Seems plenty haha.I was pretty dead set on a 22 inch barrel.
It's may be my opinion only, but I felt like the 20 inches too short for the PRC and seven mag. My 26 inch with a 7 inch suppressor on the end of it hangs every stick, limb, tree stand arm, everything else that can make noise it hits walking through the woods. I was excited for the 20 inch but at the same time and all my reading from other forms gives me the impression the 22 inch is the minimum sweet spot length and 24 inch ( while optimal ) is still a little bit long when you add a suppressor on the end of it.
Any other thoughts on that?