I know this wildcat may be too new for anyone to have experience with it but I'm going to ask for discussion and experiences anyway. I don't need to hear about what's "better", more efficient, more popular or any other alternatives. I want to know about this wildcat. PTG has drawn up a chamber reamer for it and that looks to be just a simple neck opening of the original brass. Maybe the gunsmiths and developers out there might have some interior and exterior ballistic insights that might inform about this cartridge. Thanks in advance...
I drew this cartridge up with JGS Precision about 10 months ago. I had slightly reduced body taper and extended freebore to a quarter inch or more (can't recall the exact specs). I was designing it to launch 195gr EOLs at what I had surmised would be about 3000 ft/s from a 26 - 27" barrel. I would have about 84.0 grains of water capacity. I recognized that the RPM handles 65,000 psi max avg. pressure, which is somewhat higher than the 7mm Rem Mag making the wildcat an even better choice.
In doing the math, we figured out COAL with the selected bullet would be well over 3.900", this necessitating an action AND bottom metal capable of supporting a full 4" of cartridge (C7 length, or some such designation - a bit longer than CIP). This would require the action to be capable of cycling this length, but doing so in a configuration with standard bolt face.
Enter the BAT Machine Igniter. It checked all the boxes for $1200. I contacted BAT and received permission to call the new cartridge the "7mm Igniter." I ordered a 4" M700 internal box/hinged floorplate lightweight bottom piece from Pacific Tool abd was all set to go. Then I contacted a top nationally known gunsmith who highly advised against using this case. He explained that he had a trove of Wby rifles in the parent chambering waiting to be rebarreled for poor accuracy. He explained that simething was screwy with the case geometry/design, though didn't elaborate. It's very difficult to have something built that the builder has little confidence in building. I'm sure many of us have had these great ideas only to have them squashed by the smith, who like competitive shooters (my smith was both), are HIGHLY opinionated and generally polarizing. So the Igniter never got off the ground. One dares not ignore the voice of reason and experience in such an expensive and precise undertaking, but at the same time IT WOULD BE refreshing, satisfying, and unheard of to get a dozen reasons that we could make this work vs a dozen reasons of why it won't. Reputation in the precision gunsmithing business is priceless, and guys don't like to step outside their comfort zone and risk something they aren't uber-familiar with going awry. Fair enough, I suppose.
I was considering other smiths that might be familiar with the parent cartridge, but lo and behold, somebody published the 7mm PRC which exactly duplicates everything about my wildcat except extra long freebore, in a shorter case with Mag bolt face.
It can be a challenge to order a long action with standard bolt face period, because who builds 30-06s anymore, right?? (Not saying a .30-06 Match with 26" tube wouldn't be legit... just saying in general.) It can be an even broader challenge to find one that will accommodate the necessary length, though you may get it into a 3.715" M5 configuration if PTG didn't lengthen the leade.
What you are proposing is a cpabable cartridge given proper attention by a smith who believes in your design. Do let us know what your ballistics look like of you get a prototype up and running!