6.5 Prc reloading

It's not only the PRC, other calibers that run the shorter fat brass also can have this issue. When the PRC first came out the only option for brass was Hornady. ADG was the first to offer high quality brass and their brass is heavier which multiplies the problem. There is a custom reamer made that opens the chamber up to allow for the added case expansion. This is the route I would go
 
@jgs8163 how common is this problem and how do you fix it? I was considering getting a rifle chambered in 6.5 PRC but this seems like it could be a serious problem.
It's fairly common if you push the envelope on your loads. Hornady brass is softer than ADG but I don't think it's better. It allows for a little more sizing with less spring back. I have a finish reamer on order that will modify my chamber some at the web and it should resolve my problems.
Others have had a custom die made by Whidden and have had success. Send them 3 pieces of fired brass.
 
Last edited:
Another good thread.



 
Ok I am reloading for my new gun and I have a question, I have purchased both the ADG brass and the Lapua brass to try so which one should be the first to try??
If the first one works great then selling the others.

Thanks for any imput!

Marc
I've used ADG, Lapua, Norma, Nosler, & Hornady. Was happy with all except hornady. I'm now using all Lapua since I have enough.
 
I've used ADG, Lapua, Norma, Nosler, & Hornady. Was happy with all except hornady. I'm now using all Lapua since I have enough.
What did you not like about Hornady? I have been using it for over a year and think that it is too soft. Just curious what your thoughts are.
I should be receiving 200 pieces of Lapua today! Got lucky enough to get in on the first run.
 
What did you not like about Hornady? I have been using it for over a year and think that it is too soft. Just curious what your thoughts are.
I should be receiving 200 pieces of Lapua today! Got lucky enough to get in on the first run.
Hi Steve, I felt the same as you on it being to soft. In addition I find general inferior manufacturing signatures. Flash holes: inconsistencies in amount of burs, neck inconsistencies in neck thickness. The overall signatures of a cheaper manufacturing process with loose tolerance. Someone with no experience reloading, but slightly familiar with manufacturing could hold Hornady brass next to any of the others i mentioned and pick Hornady as the cheaper manufacturer. I do not intend to upset any brand loyal members and I'm sure many have done well with it. It's just not for the person looking for the best quality.
 
I'm just curious and always looking to learn something here... I have read here of guys annealing after firing every time. Wouldn't this exasperate the soft Hornady brass issue as reported here?
Glen, I will offer a response acknowledging that my opinion may not be valid. I stayed away from annealing until recently as I mostly shoot match chambers built to min saami specs then reload in custom dies built to match my chamber thus my brass only gets worked much on the 1st firing.
I don't think the annealing process will have any adverse effect on Hornady brass doe to being softer. If done at the proper temperature it should just return the hardening from being worked back closer to the original molecular structure.
 
It's fairly common if you push the envelope on your loads. Hornady brass is softer than ADG but I don't think it's better. It allows for a little more sizing with less spring back. I have a finish reamer on order that will modify my chamber some at the web and it should resolve my problems.
Others have had a custom die made by Whidden and have had success. Send them 3 pieces of fired brass.
I use a custom Whidden die & have not experienced anything that I've read about. Both of my 65 PRCs were built by GAP on XM actions & custom throated for the long heavies by dummy rounds I sent. My throats are both no turn necks with min clearance and heard they were worried about the thicker necks from Lapua. I've received my ZLapua. & it's not an issue.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top